Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047834›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

Zero as a semantic boundary: Rethinking the mental number line.

Tali Leibovich-Raveh, Christine Mireb-Geraisy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tali Leibovich-Raveh *Department of Mathematics Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. tleibovi@univ.haifa.ac.il.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8692-9480
Christine Mireb-Geraisy *Department of Mathematics Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zero poses a unique challenge for numerical cognition because it denotes absence in cardinal contexts, yet functions as a formal entity in ordinal or interval systems. We examined how adults compare zero to positive single-digit numbers across symbolic, nonsymbolic, and mixed formats. Results replicated classic distance and end effects for positive numbers. However, the cognitive status of zero was found to be strictly format-dependent. In the symbolic format, the distance effect was driven by boundary values (0 and 1) and vanished when they were removed, suggesting symbolic zero functions as a structural anchor that defines the semantic transition from absence to quantity. In contrast, nonsymbolic zero was integrated into a continuous, nonlinear magnitude gradient, following the same psychophysical power-function pattern as other quantities. Furthermore, the [0, 1] pair elicited a unique facilitation in nonsymbolic and mixed formats, but not in the symbolic format. Together, these findings suggest that zero is not merely a point on a scale but a multi-faceted construct: while nonsymbolic zero is processed as a perceptual category of absence, symbolic zero acts as a semantic boundary that redefines the internal structure of the mental number line.

Indexed as

CognitionMathematical ConceptsMathematicsSemanticsAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42047834
PMCPMC13124765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.