Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2026
AdvanTIG-206: a phase II, randomized study of ociperlimab plus tislelizumab and BAT1706 (bevacizumab biosimilar) versus tislelizumab and BAT1706 in first-line hepatocellular carcinoma.
Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04948697 (A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-labeled Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Ociperlimab in Combination With Tislelizumab Plus BAT1706 and of Tislelizumab Plus BAT1706 as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-labeled Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Ociperlimab in Combination With Tislelizumab Plus BAT1706 and of Tislelizumab Plus BAT1706 as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have an unmet need for new therapies that improve survival. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of ociperlimab and tislelizumab plus BAT1706 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) in patients with first-line HCC.
methodsIn this phase II, multicenter, randomized, multi-arm, open-label trial, patients with advanced HCC received ociperlimab and tislelizumab plus BAT1706 (Arm A) or tislelizumab plus BAT1706 (Arm B). The primary objective was to evaluate efficacy using objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigator per RESIST v1.1 for Arms A and B.
results94 patients were randomized to Arm A (N = 62) and Arm B (N = 32). Confirmed ORR (95% confidence interval) was 37.1% (25.2-50.3) for Arm A and 40.6% (23.7-59.4) for Arm B. In Arms A and B, respectively, 90.3% and 80.6% of patients experienced treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), 59.7% and 32.3% experienced Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related TEAEs and 22.6% and 9.7% experienced treatment-related TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Immune-mediated adverse events were reported in 50.0% of patients in Arm A and 45.2% of patients in Arm B. Infusion-related reactions occurred in a single patient in Arm A.
conclusionIn patients with advanced HCC, tislelizumab plus BAT1706 demonstrated promising ORR, while adding ociperlimab was not associated with improved efficacy. The safety profile of ociperlimab and tislelizumab plus BAT1706 was tolerable and manageable, with no new safety signals identified.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04948697 (September 20, 2021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.