Trial reportWorld journal of urology2026
Active surveillance for renal masses up to 2 cm: long-term oncological outcomes from a prospective multi-institutional study.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe widespread use of cross-sectional imaging has increased the incidental detection of small renal masses (SRMs). In this context, overtreatment represents a major concern, particularly for lesions < 2 cm. Most evidence derives from retrospective registries, whereas prospective data remain limited.
methodsThis multi-center, prospective, non-randomized clinical trial was conducted in five European centers between January 2015 and July 2021. Seventy-six patients aged > 50 years with asymptomatic, unilateral SRM < 2 cm were enrolled and followed under a structured prospective active surveillance (AS) protocol with periodic axial imaging. Active treatment was recommended according to predefined progression criteria or patient preference. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS); secondary endpoints included treatment-free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific mortality (CSM).
results69 patients were included in the analyses. After a median follow-up of 88 months, 8-year EFS and TFS were 66% and 83%, respectively. 17% of patients required active treatment, mainly due to tumor growth. The 8-year OS and CSM were 88% and 9.6%. One patient died of metastatic RCC. Shorter tumor doubling time (DT) (< 12 years) and high RENAL score were significantly associated with higher risks of event and treatment. Endophytic tumors, and higher PADUA score also predicted adverse outcomes.
conclusionLong-term follow-up confirms AS as the standard initial option for selected patients with SRMs ≤ 2 cm, with a low rate of progression and optimal survival rates. Tumor DT and mass location should be considered in clinical decision-making to identify patients who will deserve a deferred treatment in case of progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42047824What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.