Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047803›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Contrast-enhanced MRI improves diagnostic accuracy in stage Tis-T1 rectal cancer: a head-to-head comparison with endorectal ultrasound.

Lijuan Wan, Diliang Li, Yaqing Kong, Guoxu Zhao, Fan Yang, Mengwen Liu, Zhe Gao, Wenwen Fan, Yuan Liu, Hongmei Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lijuan Wan *Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Diliang Li *Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yaqing Kong *Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Guoxu ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Mengwen LiuDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhe GaoDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wenwen FanDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuan LiuDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. liuyuan9348@sina.com.
Hongmei ZhangDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 13581968865@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6421-4126

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2024-I2M-C&T-A-007the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82402229the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82572178the Special Research Fund for Central Universities, Peking Union Medical College 3332024050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether the addition of contrast-enhanced sequences improves the diagnostic value of MRI in Tis-T1 rectal cancer and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS). MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with pathologically confirmed Tis-T2 rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between January 2020 and December 2023 were enrolled. All patients underwent preoperative MRI (including contrast-enhanced sequencing) and ERUS. Tumor shape and the status of muscularis propria (SMP) were evaluated on T2-weighted images by a radiologist, whereas submucosal enhancing stripe (SES) was assessed on contrast-enhanced MRI. An MRI-based combined model was constructed by integrating tumor shape, SMP, and SES features. ERUS-based tumor staging was performed by an endoscopist. The diagnostic performance of SMP, SES, the combined model, and ERUS in identifying stage Tis-T1 lesions was evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) was calculated, and statistical differences were assessed using the DeLong method.

resultsIn total, 136 patients (mean age: 60 ± 10 years; 78 men) with 138 lesions (82 Tis-T1 and 56 T2 lesions) were enrolled. The AUC values for SMP, SES, the combined model, and ERUS were 0.762 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.682-0.830), 0.861 (95% CI: 0.792-0.914), 0.915 (95% CI: 0.856-0.956), and 0.806 (95% CI: 0.730-0.868), respectively. Adding contrast-enhanced MRI feature significantly improved the diagnostic performance over the common approach (combined model vs SMP: AUC difference = 0.154; p < 0.001), and the combined model was also better than ERUS (AUC difference = 0.109; p = 0.003).

conclusionIncorporating contrast-enhanced MRI improves stage Tis-T1 rectal cancer diagnostic accuracy and outperforms ERUS. KEY POINTS: Question Can adding contrast-enhanced MRI feature improve the diagnostic performance of MRI in identifying stage Tis-T1 rectal cancer compared to ERUS? Findings The MRI-based combined model incorporating contrast-enhanced and T2WI features achieved the best diagnostic performance (AUC value: 0.915), significantly superior to that of ERUS (p = 0.003). Clinical relevance Incorporating contrast-enhanced MRI offers a more reliable basis for personalized organ-sparing treatment planning and provides a foundation for future clinical practice guidelines.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaEndosonographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingRectal NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRectumReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaContrast mediaEndosonographyMagnetic resonance imagingOrgan sparing treatmentsRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.