ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Contrast-enhanced MRI improves diagnostic accuracy in stage Tis-T1 rectal cancer: a head-to-head comparison with endorectal ultrasound.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Rectal Cancer: Diagnostic Challenges and the Role of Endoscopic Intermuscular Dissection Within the Therapeutic Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether the addition of contrast-enhanced sequences improves the diagnostic value of MRI in Tis-T1 rectal cancer and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS). MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with pathologically confirmed Tis-T2 rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between January 2020 and December 2023 were enrolled. All patients underwent preoperative MRI (including contrast-enhanced sequencing) and ERUS. Tumor shape and the status of muscularis propria (SMP) were evaluated on T2-weighted images by a radiologist, whereas submucosal enhancing stripe (SES) was assessed on contrast-enhanced MRI. An MRI-based combined model was constructed by integrating tumor shape, SMP, and SES features. ERUS-based tumor staging was performed by an endoscopist. The diagnostic performance of SMP, SES, the combined model, and ERUS in identifying stage Tis-T1 lesions was evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) was calculated, and statistical differences were assessed using the DeLong method.
resultsIn total, 136 patients (mean age: 60 ± 10 years; 78 men) with 138 lesions (82 Tis-T1 and 56 T2 lesions) were enrolled. The AUC values for SMP, SES, the combined model, and ERUS were 0.762 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.682-0.830), 0.861 (95% CI: 0.792-0.914), 0.915 (95% CI: 0.856-0.956), and 0.806 (95% CI: 0.730-0.868), respectively. Adding contrast-enhanced MRI feature significantly improved the diagnostic performance over the common approach (combined model vs SMP: AUC difference = 0.154; p < 0.001), and the combined model was also better than ERUS (AUC difference = 0.109; p = 0.003).
conclusionIncorporating contrast-enhanced MRI improves stage Tis-T1 rectal cancer diagnostic accuracy and outperforms ERUS. KEY POINTS: Question Can adding contrast-enhanced MRI feature improve the diagnostic performance of MRI in identifying stage Tis-T1 rectal cancer compared to ERUS? Findings The MRI-based combined model incorporating contrast-enhanced and T2WI features achieved the best diagnostic performance (AUC value: 0.915), significantly superior to that of ERUS (p = 0.003). Clinical relevance Incorporating contrast-enhanced MRI offers a more reliable basis for personalized organ-sparing treatment planning and provides a foundation for future clinical practice guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42047803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.