ArticleJournal of cross-cultural gerontology2026
Expressions of Perceived Ageism During Wartime in Israel.
Article in Journal of cross-cultural gerontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ageism, a widespread social phenomenon, encompasses stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination based on age. It can be directed towards people of all ages but has received the most attention in relation to older people. While a growing body of research has examined ageism, there remains a notable gap in understanding how age-related dynamics are perceived and interpreted by individuals as ageism during crises in general, and during wartime in particular. This study explores the unique expressions of perceived ageism during “Swords of Iron” war in Israel, using a case study approach. It draws on a survey of 902 Israeli citizens aged 18 to 89 during April 2024. Respondents answered two open-ended questions concerning their general views of ageism during the war as well as their own personal experiences with ageism during the war. In total, 357 (39.6%) of the responses described ageism in the current war, and 156 (17.3%) referred to its presence based on their personal experiences. Six key domains of perceived ageism were identified during the war: reserve military service, employment opportunities, perceptions of mental resilience versus vulnerability, volunteering, opportunities for blood donation, and prioritization in hostage release according to chronological age. These findings demonstrate how crises can intensify the perception of age-based differences and hierarchies, as individuals interpret age-related dynamics through the lens of potential exclusion or bias. This case study highlights the importance of developing intergenerational policies and crisis management strategies that address how age-based practices are experienced and perceived, particularly during extreme conditions such as war.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.