ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2026
Managing Shoulder Instability in the Contact and Collision Athlete.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Return to Sport After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Professional Male Football Players.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewcondition among collision and contact athletes, frequently resulting in significant time away from sport and long-term functional limitations. Due to the high physical demands and risk of recurrent injury in this population, accurate diagnosis and treatment are essential. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical assessment and management of shoulder instability in these high-risk athletes. RECENT
findingsShoulder instability can be managed non-operatively or operatively. Recurrent instability is common with non-operative treatment, particularly in young male contact and collision athletes. Surgical management significantly reduces recurrence and improves return-to-sport outcomes. Anterior instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair generally demonstrates good results, but risk factors for failure include multiple dislocations, hyperlaxity, glenoid bone loss, and delayed intervention. Augmentation with remplissage improves outcomes over Bankart repair alone and yields results comparable to the Latarjet procedure, which is reserved for critical glenoid bone loss but is technically demanding. Posterior instability treated with arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair shows high return-to-sport rates and superior patient-reported outcomes compared with conservative management. Clinical decision-making should prioritize restoring stability, regaining function, and facilitating a safe return to sport. Patient-specific factors such as age, level of play, athletic goals, risk of recurrence, and extent of bone loss must also be carefully considered. A thorough understanding of shoulder instability in this population is essential to guide management and minimize the risk of recurrent instability, progressive bone loss, and long-term shoulder dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.