ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026
Thermocycling: enhancing efficiency of anesthetic reflectors through cyclic heating and cooling-finding the optimal temperature in a bench study.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVolatile anesthetics are widely used for sedation in intensive care. Being potent greenhouse gases, their efficient utilization is imperative. We investigated whether the efficiency of anesthetic reflection devices, such as Sedaconda ACD-S (ACD), can be improved by thermocycling, i.e., cooling the reflector during expiration and warming it during inspiration, and aimed to identify the optimal temperatures required.
methodsA test lung connected to the ACD was ventilated under body temperature pressure saturated and normocapnic conditions. Isoflurane and sevoflurane were infused at rates of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 mL/h, with sevoflurane additionally administered at 10 mL/h. For thermocycling, inspired air was heated to 37 °C by an active humidifier without water. Cooling in steps of 26, 21, 16, 11, 6, and 1 °C was achieved by passing air from the test lung through a freezer before reaching the ACD.
resultsThermocycling significantly increased concentrations of isoflurane and sevoflurane in the test lung compared with control conditions. Cooling of the expired air led to substantial increases down to a cooling temperature of 16 °C; below 16 °C, further increases in concentrations were much smaller. Interpolation of our data shows that at clinically used concentrations (isoflurane: 0.4-0.6 Vol%; sevoflurane: 0.9-1.1 Vol%), consumption could be reduced by 70% (isoflurane from 2.46 to 0.74 mL/h) and 72% (sevoflurane from 5.73 to 1.60 mL/h). Reflection efficiencies-the ratio of re-inspired from exhaled anesthetic molecules in one breath-increased from around 70% to 90%.
conclusionsThermocycling significantly enhances the efficiency of volatile anesthetic reflection, offering a promising strategy to reduce the impact of intensive care sedation on climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.