ReviewArchives of toxicology2026
In vitro models for testicular steroidogenesis: current status and future perspectives.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Testicular steroidogenesis is fundamental to male reproductive health, but its disruption by environmental and emerging chemicals remains insufficiently characterized due to limitations in existing test systems. Traditional animal models pose ethical and logistical challenges, while the validated H295R assay-based on a female adrenal carcinoma cell line-fails to reflect male gonadal steroidogenesis. This review uses a semi-systematic approach to evaluate over 1500 studies employing in vitro models, including primary Leydig cells, Leydig cell lines, stem cell-derived Leydig-like cells, and advanced 3D testicular systems. We assess species origin, developmental relevance, culture conditions, and the extent to which these models replicate key steroidogenic pathways. Most models rely on rodent-derived, cancerous cell lines cultured in two-dimensional monolayers, with limited representation of human and immature Leydig cells. A targeted full-text analysis examined the effects of 23 reference chemicals on testosterone, progesterone, androstenedione, and estrogen levels across the H295R assay and eight testicular in vitro models. Forskolin, genistein, prochloraz, and ketoconazole showed consistent effects and may serve as promising reference compounds. However, data for most chemicals in testicular models are scarce or inconsistent-particularly for androstenedione and progesterone-underscoring the need for improved model standardization. We propose future directions to enhance predictive power, including the development of hormone-responsive, species- and stage-specific models cultured under hormone-controlled conditions. Such advances are essential to improve chemical safety assessment and facilitate regulatory acceptance of alternative test methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.