ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Epidemiology of Astigmatism in Japan: Analysis of More Than 9,000,000 Spectacle Prescriptions.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize the prevalence of astigmatism and stratify it by age, sex, and geographic region and evaluate interocular differences in cylinder power in a large-scale Japanese population using spectacle prescription data. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed de-identified spectacle prescription data collected from a nationwide optical retail chain between September 2021 and August 2023. The targeted individuals were aged 6 to 89 years. They were categorized based on their cylinder power and axis orientation. Step 1 involved evaluating these parameters across different ages, sexes, and regions. Step 2 involved quantifying the interocular differences in the individuals with astigmatism (cylinder power of ≥0.25 diopter [D]) in at least one eye. Results: We analyzed 9,204,993 prescriptions (50.8% female subjects). The cylinder power increased progressively with age, and this was accompanied by a shift from with-the-rule (WTR) to against-the-rule (ATR) orientation. Men had slightly higher cylinder powers and a higher prevalence of ATR astigmatism than women. The regional variation across Japan was modest. Interocular comparison revealed that 81.6% and 9.4% of the individuals had differences in cylinder power of ≤0.50 D and ≥1.00 D, respectively. These findings indicate substantial bilateral symmetry in most individuals. Conclusions: This nationwide analysis of spectacle prescription data provides an updated epidemiologic overview of astigmatism in Japan. We characterized the age-, sex-, and region-related variations in cylinder power and axis orientation and quantified the interocular asymmetry at the population level. These findings highlight the value of large-scale prescription databases as a novel resource for population-based vision research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.