ReviewFamily practice2026
Primary healthcare practitioners' views and experiences of providing postpartum contraception counselling and care: a rapid review.
Review in Family practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary healthcare practitioners play a pivotal role in postpartum care. Many countries encourage women to attend a postnatal check after birth, providing an ideal opportunity for contraceptive care. However, contraception is often not discussed, increasing the risk of unintended pregnancy and short interpregnancy intervals.
objectiveTo explore primary healthcare practitioners' views and experiences of providing postpartum contraceptive counselling and care to better understand the gaps, needs, and opportunities.
methodsA rapid review was conducted of English language peer-reviewed primary research studies from high-income countries focussing on primary healthcare practitioners' views and experiences of providing postpartum contraceptive counselling and care. Studies were retrieved from five databases, supplemented by Google Scholar and citation searching. Key characteristics were extracted, and thematic analysis identified key themes.
resultsAltogether, 2255 references were identified, with eight studies included. Four themes were constructed: (1) varied knowledge and attitudes regarding postpartum contraception, including views on of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), safety concerns, and optimal counselling timing; (2) structural and logistical barriers to contraception provision in primary healthcare, including lack of LARC availability, time constraints, and funding issues; (3) limited contraception education and training for practitioners in LARC provision, with practitioners lacking skills or motivation to upskill; and (4) gaps in postpartum contraception resources and guidelines needed to promote postpartum contraceptive care.
conclusionImproving postpartum contraceptive counselling requires embedding comprehensive contraceptive training in healthcare education, developing standardized guidelines for postpartum appointments, and addressing barriers such as time constraints, lack of resources and funding to support effective contraception care for postpartum women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.