Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047581›Full record

ArticleHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2026

A novel approach to the assessment of repeat self-harm in prisoners: development and validation of a tool to bridge assessment and treatment (RAPSS).

Seena Fazel, Leanne Heathcote, Leen Farouki, Jane Senior, Amanda Perry, Thomas Fanshawe, Jenny Shaw

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seena FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5383-5365
Leanne HeathcoteDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2279-9621
Leen FaroukiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6637-1870
Jane SeniorDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7133-4898
Amanda PerryDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0279-1884
Thomas FanshaweNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9928-8934
Jenny ShawDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2569-7687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Repetition of self-harm in prisoners is common but approaches to assess and manage risk of repetition are inconsistent and unstructured. Objective: To develop and validate a risk model for repeat self-harm in people in prison, and test feasibility and acceptability. Methods: In seven English prisons, we identified 754 people aged over 17 who had been placed on a suicide risk management plan (known as an Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork) after a self-harm episode or elevated risk. We developed a multivariable model to estimate risk of repeat suicidality at 3 months using routinely collected sociodemographic, clinical and prison-related factors, which were tested using Cox proportional hazards models. We tested 25 potential risk factors comprising sociodemographic factors, clinical history and treatment, and criminal records using routinely collected information. In a prospective validation sample of 390 people from 13 prisons, we tested this model to assess risk of repeat suicidality at 3 months across a range of performance measures. TRIPOD guidelines were followed for the design and reporting of this work. In a parallel study, we qualitatively ran separate focus groups for prison staff and people in prison to examine practical issues relating to the potential use of a new tool, and synthesised themes. Findings: In the overall final sample of 1144 people in prison [966 (84%) men, mean age 33 years], 22% had the outcome of repeat suicidality over 3 months. The final risk model consisted of 9 factors, including sex, calendar age, and features of recent suicidal behaviour. Calibration and discrimination were similar in both development and validation samples, with O:E ratio = 1.09 (95% confidence interval 0.88 to 1.35) and c-statistic = 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.72) in external validation. At a 25% cut-off, sensitivity was 58% (50-66%) and specificity 72% (68-75%) in external validation. The tool (Risk Assessment for people in Prison at risk of Self-harm and Suicide or RAPSS) is available as an online risk calculator at https://oxrisk.com/rapsstrial/ and could be used towards the end or on completion of an existing suicide risk management plan. The qualitative study, conducted with multidisciplinary staff groups and two prisoner groups (one male and one female), led to eight themes being identified. Two prominent ones were staff saying that they would be keen to use the tool as a way to identify needs and signpost to other services, and people in prison explaining that any risk tool could help build rapport with their offender manager and support them to access psychological treatments and other services. Conclusions: We have developed and externally validated a brief structured tool that could act as a therapeutic bridge between the closure of a suicide risk management plan and aftercare provision for people at risk of repeat self-harm in prison. Future work: Feasibility work examining how to implement the Risk Assessment for people in Prison at risk of Self-harm and Suicide (RAPSS) tool into practice is necessary, and linking interventions to risk scores. Limitations: The risk model did not test symptoms as possible factors as these were unreliably documented. Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 16/159/09.

Indexed as

PrisonersSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdultEnglandFemaleHealth Services for PrisonersHumansMaleProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSuicideYoung AdultPREDICTIONPRISONRISKRISK ASSESSMENTSELF-HARMSUICIDAL

Identifiers

PMID42047581
PMCPMC13158817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.