SynthesisActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Probiotic supplementation during pregnancy for vaginal microbiota improvement and pathogen clearance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPregnancy is associated with susceptibility to vaginal dysbiosis, including Group B Streptococcus (GBS), bacterial vaginosis (BV), and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). Probiotic supplementation has emerged as a potential strategy to restore vaginal microecology, yet its effectiveness during pregnancy remains uncertain. MATERIAL AND
methodsTo evaluate whether probiotic supplementation during pregnancy increases the likelihood of clearance of GBS colonization, BV, and VVC. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science from inception to 16 April 2025. Eligible studies were randomized or non-randomized studies comparing probiotic supplementation with placebo or no treatment in pregnant women, reporting outcomes related to vaginal microbiota, pathogen decolonization, or infection resolution. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were evaluated using the Cochrane ROB-1 tool, and the single non-RCT was assessed using ROBINS-I. Meta-analyses were performed for co-primary outcomes, with subgroup analyses by timing, comparator type (placebo-controlled vs. no-treatment control), and duration of intervention.
resultsEighteen studies (n = 3705) were included. For the co-primary outcomes, a statistically significant increase in the odds of GBS decolonization was observed (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08-1.76; I
conclusionsProbiotic supplementation during pregnancy may increase the likelihood of GBS decolonization. However, this association was not statistically significant in sensitivity analyses restricted to randomized and placebo-controlled trials. No consistent benefit was observed for BV or VVC. Standardized probiotic regimens and harmonized diagnostic frameworks are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.