Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047468›Full record

SynthesisActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Probiotic supplementation during pregnancy for vaginal microbiota improvement and pathogen clearance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zimo Liu, Roujie Huang, Tianshu Sun, Lan Zhu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zimo LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research of Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0005-3344-2969
Roujie HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research of Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Tianshu SunClinical Biobank, National Infrastructures for Translational Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1738-6216
Lan ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research of Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5753-5426

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2025-I2M-XHZY-037the Independent Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Complex, Severe, and Rare Diseases 2025-I-PY-010the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82530054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPregnancy is associated with susceptibility to vaginal dysbiosis, including Group B Streptococcus (GBS), bacterial vaginosis (BV), and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). Probiotic supplementation has emerged as a potential strategy to restore vaginal microecology, yet its effectiveness during pregnancy remains uncertain. MATERIAL AND

methodsTo evaluate whether probiotic supplementation during pregnancy increases the likelihood of clearance of GBS colonization, BV, and VVC. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science from inception to 16 April 2025. Eligible studies were randomized or non-randomized studies comparing probiotic supplementation with placebo or no treatment in pregnant women, reporting outcomes related to vaginal microbiota, pathogen decolonization, or infection resolution. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were evaluated using the Cochrane ROB-1 tool, and the single non-RCT was assessed using ROBINS-I. Meta-analyses were performed for co-primary outcomes, with subgroup analyses by timing, comparator type (placebo-controlled vs. no-treatment control), and duration of intervention.

resultsEighteen studies (n = 3705) were included. For the co-primary outcomes, a statistically significant increase in the odds of GBS decolonization was observed (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08-1.76; I

conclusionsProbiotic supplementation during pregnancy may increase the likelihood of GBS decolonization. However, this association was not statistically significant in sensitivity analyses restricted to randomized and placebo-controlled trials. No consistent benefit was observed for BV or VVC. Standardized probiotic regimens and harmonized diagnostic frameworks are needed.

Indexed as

Candidiasis, VulvovaginalMicrobiotaPregnancy Complications, InfectiousProbioticsVaginaVaginosis, BacterialFemaleHumansPregnancyStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus agalactiaebacterial vaginosiscervicovaginal microbiomegroup B streptococcusprobioticsvulvovaginal candidiasis

Identifiers

PMID42047468
PMCPMC13191816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.