Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047251›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2026

Integrating Uncertainty Quantification into Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of Coronary Arteries Under Steady Flow.

Muhammad Usman, Peter N Castillo, Akil Narayan, Lucas H Timmins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad UsmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 2121 W Holcombe Boulevard, Alkek Building, Houston, TX 77030.
Peter N CastilloDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 2121 W Holcombe Blvd., Alkek Building, Houston, TX 77030.
Akil NarayanScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, 72 S Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Lucas H TimminsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah,Salt Lake City, UT 84112; Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112;Department of Biomeidcal Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 2121 W Holcombe Boulevard, Alkek Building, Houston, TX 77030.ORCID 0000-0002-8707-8120

Funding

Biomechanical Indices for Coronary Lesion Rupture Risk and Lesion PrognosticationR01HL150608 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HSU, EDWARD W, TIMMINS, LUCAS H. · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Integration of Uncertainty Quantification with SCIRun Bioelectric Field Simulation PipelineU24EB029012 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL150608NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029012NIH HHS R01 HL-150608, U24 ED-029012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are increasingly being integrated into clinical medicine, where they have the potential to support clinicians in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. However, these models frequently use deterministic approaches, neglecting inherent variability (or uncertainty) in input parameters, thereby undermining model credibility and limiting clinical adoption. Herein, we integrate modern and certifiable uncertainty quantification techniques to characterize and quantify the variability in coronary artery wall shear stress (WSS) under steady-flow conditions due to intrinsic uncertainty in model-dependent quantities. Univariate probability distributions were fitted to hemodynamic parameters (density, pressure, radius, velocity, and viscosity), and sampled parameter ensembles were applied to an analytical solution (Poiseuille flow) and a patient-specific coronary artery model. Results from the analytical solution demonstrated that variability in input parameters propagated into uncertainty in WSS values, with uncertainty in velocity accounting for the majority (∼81%) of WSS variability. In the patient-specific model, spatial medians in WSS varied by ∼50% due to input parameter uncertainties, with viscosity (∼59%) and velocity (∼40%) emerging as the dominant contributors to WSS variability. Across each use case, unary interactions dominated (i.e., first-order Sobol indices accounted for the majority of the variance), contributing to ∼93% and ∼99% of the total WSS variance in the analytical and patient-specific model, respectively. Collectively, this study establishes an uncertainty-aware framework to strengthen computational biomechanics model credibility, aligning with emerging regulatory guidance and enabling more trustworthy modeling-based decision support in the management of coronary artery disease.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCoronary VesselsHydrodynamicsModels, CardiovascularBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansShear StrengthStress, MechanicalUncertaintybiomechanicscoronary artery diseaseFEBio software suitepatient-specific modelingUncertainSCIvascular mechanics

Identifiers

PMID42047251
PMCPMC13200213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.