ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Neural Substrates of Attentional Control During Emotional Processing: Evidence From rTMS-fMRI Targeting the Frontal Eye Field.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Past research has provided conflicting evidence concerning whether emotional processing in the amygdala arises independent of selective attention to threat-related stimuli or instead depends on attentional resources and top-down voluntary control. Here, we combine repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the right frontal eye field (FEF) with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine how perturbing top-down attentional control is associated with changes in neural responses to emotional stimuli in visual cortex and amygdala. Participants performed a matching task in which they had to judge whether task-relevant image pairs were similar or different while ignoring task-irrelevant pairs. On each trial, one pair showed houses and the other pair displayed either neutral or fearful faces. The task was performed in two sessions following either rTMS or no TMS, in counterbalanced order. Behavioral results revealed that right FEF perturbation selectively slowed responses to neutral but not fearful faces. ROI analyses revealed selective changes in fusiform face area (FFA) responses to neutral faces following FEF rTMS, while responses to fearful faces were relatively preserved; in parallel, amygdala responses to fearful faces remained intact or showed increased activation. A control group undergoing the same protocol with rTMS applied to the vertex (VTX) showed no significant changes in behavioral performance or neural activation patterns. Together, these findings suggest that neural responses to emotionally salient stimuli may be less dependent on top-down attentional modulation than responses to neutral stimuli, consistent with models proposing partially distinct contributions of attentional and emotional processing networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.