Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047156›Full record

ReviewTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2026

Brief history of ophidiology and ophidism in Colombia.

Carlos A Cañas, Santiago Castaño-Valencia, Fernando Castro-Herrera

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlos A CañasUnit of Rheumatology, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali 760031, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-3700
Santiago Castaño-ValenciaLaboratory of Herpetology and Toxinology, Department of Physiological Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, Universidad del Valle,  Cali 760031, Colombia.
Fernando Castro-HerreraLaboratory of Herpetology and Toxinology, Department of Physiological Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760031, Colombia.

Funding

CIRAT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review traces the historical trajectory of ophidiology (the study of snakes) and ophidism (snakebite envenoming) within the Colombian context. Despite the profound cultural and scientific significance of the human-serpent relationship in the region, the relevant literature remains fragmented, with foundational historical works neither digitized nor readily accessible. To address this, we conducted a narrative review of primary sources spanning from the pre-Colombian era to the present. Our methodology involved sourcing material from specialized libraries, historical archives, personal collections and contemporary scientific databases. The analysis identifies and contextualizes pivotal contributions across distinct historical periods, from early archeological evidence and colonial accounts to foundational eighteenth-century works and the formalized scientific studies of the last two centuries. The review culminates by highlighting how modern Colombian research, including significant international collaborations, is now producing influential work on snake biology, venoms and envenoming that commands global attention.

Indexed as

Snake BitesSnakesSnake VenomsAnimalsColombiaHistory, 15th CenturyHistory, 16th CenturyHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, 18th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHistory, AncientHistory, MedievalHumansSnake Venomsenvenomingevolutionherpetologysnakesnakebitesvenoms

Identifiers

PMID42047156
PMCPMC13339087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.