Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047095›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026

GAPIT version 4: integration of GWAS into genomic prediction.

Jiabo Wang, Zhiwu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiabo WangKey Laboratory of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Animal Genetic Resource Reservation and Utilization, Sichuan Province and Ministry of Education, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1386-0435
Zhiwu ZhangDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5784-9684

Funding

Endowment and Research Project 126593Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China ZYN2024050Heilongjiang Province Key Research and Development Project, China 2022ZX02B09National Key Research and Development Project of China, China 2022YFD1601601Science and Technology Plan Project of the Xizang Autonomous Region, China X7202502ZY0001Washington Grain Commission and USDA 2020-67021-32460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction leverages all available markers, irrespective of their statistical significance in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Recent advancements in marker density, sample sizes, and sophisticated statistical GWAS methods have demonstrated that integrating GWAS results can potentially boost the accuracy of genomic predictions. The Genomic Association and Prediction Tool (GAPIT) has recently begun incorporating GWAS findings into its prediction framework, streamlining this approach, referred to as GWAS-Assisted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GAGBLUP). A sufficient simulation study revealed that the benefits of GAGBLUP depend on the GWAS model used. Multiple-locus models, such as Bayesian information and linkage-disequilibrium iteratively nested keyway (BLINK), outperformed single-locus models, such as the mixed linear model. Specifically, when BLINK GWAS results in a real trait were incorporated into Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP), prediction accuracy improved by over 20% compared to GBLUP alone. This approach integrates the trait-specific insights from GWAS with the polygenic modeling capacity of GBLUP, resulting in more stable prediction across varying genetic backgrounds. This broader applicability enhances the utility of genomic selection in breeding programs, enabling its deployment across a wider range of crops and trait architectures.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsSoftwareBayes TheoremLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrediction AlgorithmsQuantitative Trait Lociaccuracybreedinggenetic markersgenomic selectionlinkage disequilibrium

Identifiers

PMID42047095
PMCPMC13183175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.