ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
GAPIT version 4: integration of GWAS into genomic prediction.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Approach for Compound Angus Populations Revealing Positional Candidate Genes and Improving Prediction Accuracy in Carcass Traits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Association Studies of Agronomic and Yield Traits in Sweet Corn (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing genomic prediction of wheat resistance to fusarium head blight through integration of passive resistance traits.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic prediction leverages all available markers, irrespective of their statistical significance in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Recent advancements in marker density, sample sizes, and sophisticated statistical GWAS methods have demonstrated that integrating GWAS results can potentially boost the accuracy of genomic predictions. The Genomic Association and Prediction Tool (GAPIT) has recently begun incorporating GWAS findings into its prediction framework, streamlining this approach, referred to as GWAS-Assisted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GAGBLUP). A sufficient simulation study revealed that the benefits of GAGBLUP depend on the GWAS model used. Multiple-locus models, such as Bayesian information and linkage-disequilibrium iteratively nested keyway (BLINK), outperformed single-locus models, such as the mixed linear model. Specifically, when BLINK GWAS results in a real trait were incorporated into Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP), prediction accuracy improved by over 20% compared to GBLUP alone. This approach integrates the trait-specific insights from GWAS with the polygenic modeling capacity of GBLUP, resulting in more stable prediction across varying genetic backgrounds. This broader applicability enhances the utility of genomic selection in breeding programs, enabling its deployment across a wider range of crops and trait architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.