ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Sustaining Healthy Communities in rural settings: lessons from multisectoral teams in Alberta, Canada.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Alberta Healthy Communities Approach (AHCA) supports communities in creating environments that support healthy behaviors and reduce the risk of cancer and chronic disease. In this 4-year project, participating rural communities implemented an iterative five-step process that included establishing multisectoral teams (MSTs) to develop, implement, and evaluate health promotion initiatives aligned with local priorities. Communities received implementation support through mentoring and facilitation, evidence-based tools, and seed funding. This study examined: What factors are essential to sustaining the AHCA in rural communities? Nineteen communities and 258 MST members participated. Community perspectives on factors and strategies influencing sustainability were captured through surveys and focus groups. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis and codebook thematic analysis, and findings were synthesized narratively. Five key factors were identified, including: strong local leadership, community engagement, municipal support, capacity building, and maintaining collaboration. Strategies that supported sustainability included: developing transition plans and sharing responsibilities across MST members; maintaining ongoing, tailored engagement activities and using multiple communication channels; engaging local government early and aligning initiatives with municipal priorities; identifying training, mentoring, and shared learning opportunities; and investing continuously in relationships and trust building. These findings offer actionable recommendations for strengthening rural health promotion efforts and sustaining MSTs and community-led initiatives. Overall, the study highlights that proactive sustainability planning is a key contributor to the long-term success of community-led health promotion in rural settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.