ReviewJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B2026
Microencapsulation and characterization of controlled-release intestinal drugs: a critical review.
Review in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oral administration is associated with high patient adherence, as it is not only the route for primary site absorption of nutrients and peptide drugs but also is important for treating intestinal diseases. However, traditional oral intestinal drugs are limited by drug degradation and inactivation, particularly for proteins and peptides, due to gastric acid and digestive enzymes, making it difficult to effectively deliver drugs to target sites. To address these challenges, controlled-release microencapsulated intestinal drugs (MeIDs) have been developed and have attracted attention for their ability to protect drugs from degradation by gastric acid and digestive enzymes. In this study, we systematically reviewed research articles on the preparation methods, release mechanisms, and evaluation strategies of MeIDs using Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Science Direct databases. Our findings show that the preparation of emulsions, microencapsulation methods, shell material selection, and drug properties need to be considered comprehensively for MeID development. In addition, we found that coating, micro/nanocarriers, and absorption enhancers can be combined to enhance microcapsule performance. Beyond focusing on drug loading efficiency and microcapsule morphology, we also found that cell models, animal models, and spectroscopic analysis techniques can be used to evaluate drug biocompatibility, stability, and efficacy. Finally, the literature has shown that optimizing the preparation process can regulate drug release kinetics. For future research, we suggest that studies should focus on low-cost methods for producing monodisperse microcapsules, developing dynamic responsive shell materials, and using organ-on-a-chip technology for precise evaluation, as part of the theoretical support towards the development of microencapsulated drugs and targeted drug delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.