ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2026
Impact of enlarged perivascular spaces on endovascular therapy outcomes in patients with large ischaemic core: A post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial.
Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04551664 (Study of Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients With a Large Infarct Core), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients With a Large Infarct Core: A Multi-centered, Prospective, Open-label, Blind Endpoint, Randomized Controlled Trial(ANGEL-ASPECT)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVSs), particularly in the basal ganglia (BG), are indicators of microvascular dysfunction and impaired glymphatic clearance, which may influence stroke outcomes. Determining the threshold below which endovascular therapy (EVT) confers no additional benefit is clinically important for patients with large ischaemic infarcts. Methods: This post-hoc analysis utilized data from the ANGEL-ASPECT trial (NCT04551664), a multicentre, randomized controlled trial of 456 acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) and a large ischaemic core. Among these patients, 226 who with completed, high-quality brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. BG-EPVS severity was assessed on T2-weighted MRI and categorized as none-to-mild, moderate, or severe. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Results: EVT significantly improved 90-day mRS outcome in patients with none-to-mild (adjusted common odds ratio [cOR] 5.50, 95% CI: 2.72-11.16, Conclusions: EVT was associated with significantly improved 90-day functional outcomes in LVO-AIS patients with a large ischaemic core and none-to-mild or moderate BG-EPVS, whereas this benefit was not observed in those with severe BG-EPVS. Given the limited power in subgroup analyses, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant validation in larger, adequately powered randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.