Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046798›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2026

Peripheral Nerve Blocks Following Open Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Zhijun Ma, Jinxin Ma, Zhilong Liu, Jianhong Hu, Wenjun Yan, Dong Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhijun MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Jinxin MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Zhilong LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Jianhong HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Wenjun YanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Dong WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of various nerve blocks in patients undergoing open partial hepatectomy. Methods: We retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing different peripheral nerve blocks in patients undergoing open partial hepatectomy from databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, spanning from inception until December 2025. The NMA was performed using STATA 17.0 software. Results: A total of 17 RCTs involving 1056 patients and 8 techniques were included in the analysis. Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (cTAPB) and continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block (cTPVB) significantly decreased morphine consumption within 24 hours. The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block (TANB) reduced resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 6 hours. At 12 hours, resting VAS scores were decreased by ESPB and subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (sTAPB), while at 24 hours, resting VAS scores were lowered by TANB and cTAPB. For movement VAS scores, reductions were observed at 6 hours with ESPB and cTPVB, at 12 hours with ESPB and sTAPB, and at 24 hours with TANB and External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block (EOIPB). Additionally, ESPB and TANB were associated with a decrease in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Conclusion: While cTAPB and cTPVB ranked higher in terms of reducing 24-hour morphine consumption, the clinical difference between these techniques and other interventions was small. ESPB was more likely to reduce VAS within the first 12 hours and the PONV incidence. Nevertheless, the certainty of evidence for these findings remains low to moderate, and further high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm their clinical utility. Limitation: The studies included in our review exhibited inconsistencies in study design and analgesia protocols, which may introduce bias into our findings. The results may not be directly applicable to laparoscopic procedures. The absence of these unpublished data or ongoing trials could limit the comprehensiveness of our analysis.

Indexed as

hepatectomynerve blocknetwork meta-analysispainsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42046798
PMCPMC13110812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.