Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046781›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of breast cancer2026

Vacuum-Assisted Excision and Assessing Residual Tumor Burden in Patients With Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (A Pilot Study).

Hawzhin Hashemi, Asiie Olfatbakhsh, Shiva Moghadam, Alireza Aghanajafi, Laila Heydari, Marzieh Rostami, Shahpar Haghighat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hawzhin HashemiBreast Disease Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran, acecr.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-6074
Asiie OlfatbakhshBreast Disease Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran, acecr.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-3610
Shiva MoghadamBreast Disease Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran, acecr.ac.ir.
Alireza AghanajafiBreast Disease Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran, acecr.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3587-1573
Laila HeydariBreast Disease Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran, acecr.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7815-075X
Marzieh RostamiBreast Disease Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran, acecr.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7431-836X
Shahpar HaghighatQuality of Life Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran, acecr.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6938-467X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of vacuum-assisted excision as a minimally invasive method for assessing residual tumor burden in distinct breast cancer subtypes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: In this pilot clinical trial, 20 patients with breast cancer scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assessed. Upon completion of chemotherapy, patients underwent ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision of the tumor site, performed by a radiologist. Subsequently, surgical excision of the tumor was carried out. The pathology reports from the vacuum excision were compared with the surgical specimens to determine the concordance in detecting residual tumor tissue. Results: Among the 20 patients who underwent vacuum-assisted excision, 13 patients demonstrated no residual tumor in both vacuum pathology and surgical pathology. However, in four patients, including three cases of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) and one case of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC), a false negative vacuum excision was reported. In three patients, residual tumor was reported both in surgical and vacuum pathology. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of vacuum excision for detecting residual tumor were 100%, 76.5%, and 80%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of vacuum excision were 42.9% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study and considering the accuracy of vacuum excision in identifying residual tumors (80%), it is evident that vacuum excision cannot currently serve as a substitute modality for surgery in the management of patients with post-neoadjuvant breast cancer. Further research with a larger sample size is warranted to enhance our understanding in this area. Trial Registration: IRCT20241204063942N1.

Identifiers

PMID42046781
PMCPMC13110345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.