ArticleWellcome open research2026
Implementing and Transitioning a Laboratory Quality Management System from ISO 15189:2012 to ISO 15189:2022: Experience from the Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Research Programme, Blantyre.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- External quality assurance of molecular serotype detection of dengue virus RNA among virus research and diagnostic laboratories in India.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The implementation of a Quality Management System (QMS) in line with ISO 15189:2022 is essential for clinical and research laboratories striving to achieve technical competence and consistent delivery of valid results. This article presents the approach undertaken by Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Research Programme (MLW) laboratories to integrate and manage the QMS based on ISO 15189 and steps taken to successfully transition to the new version of the same standard. Methods: The implementation process involved several key steps, including mentorship, conducting an initial gap analysis, and implementing the quality management system. A quality officer was appointed to oversee the process, supported by leadership engagement and staff training to establish core competencies. Additional activities included the development of required documentation, participation in proficiency testing and Internal Quality Control (IQC) programmes, and the verification of test methods. Quality indicators were established to monitor performance. During the transition to the updated ISO 15189 standard, a second gap analysis was conducted, emphasising risk-based thinking and alignment with patient-centred requirements. Results: The outcomes demonstrate enhanced laboratory performance, improved documentation, and a stronger teamwork and culture of quality. This experience offers practical insights for laboratories seeking to implement ISO 15189 and underscores the importance of tailored implementation strategies that reflect the organizational context and laboratory scope. Conclusions: The successful implementation of a QMS demands a comprehensive, system-wide approach and robust teamwork to achieve established goals effectively. It necessitates ongoing periodic assessments and substantial support human and financial resources. Furthermore, continuous training and mentorship by qualified QMS professionals are essential to foster a culture of continuous improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.