Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046675›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2026

Comparative evaluation of lightweight and pre-trained deep learning models for multi-class classification of infected freshwater fish species in Thailand.

Sivaramasamy Elayaraja, Satish Nandipati, Vlastimil Stejskal, Channarong Rodkhum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sivaramasamy ElayarajaCenter of Excellence in Fish Infectious Diseases (CE FID), Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Satish NandipatiFaculty of Sciences, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice (Budweis), Czech Republic.
Vlastimil StejskalUniversity of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Institute of Aquaculture and Protection of Waters, České Budějovice 370 05, Czech Republic.
Channarong RodkhumCenter of Excellence in Fish Infectious Diseases (CE FID), Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Aquaculture plays a crucial role in global food security; however, disease outbreaks remain a major constraint to sustainable production. Rapid and reliable detection of fish diseases is essential to reduce mortality, economic losses, and the misuse of antimicrobials in aquaculture systems. Conventional diagnostic approaches, such as clinical observation and bacterial culturing, are time-consuming, costly, and require specialized expertise. Recent advances in deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown promise in automating image-based disease detection. This study aimed to compare a lightweight three-layer CNN model with pre-trained deep learning architectures (VGG16, InceptionV3, and ResNet50) for multi-class classification of infected freshwater fish species using a balanced image dataset collected from aquaculture farms in Thailand. Materials and Methods: Images from clinically infected freshwater fish were collected during routine farm inspections across six provinces in Thailand. The dataset included 424 images of four species: Asian seabass ( Results: Among the evaluated models, InceptionV3 achieved the highest classification accuracy (56.82%), followed by VGG16 (43.18%) and the proposed CNN (38.64%), while ResNet50 performed poorly (25%). The InceptionV3 model also demonstrated higher average precision (63%), recall (57%), and F1-score (56.75%), indicating superior classification capabilities. Confusion matrix analysis revealed that InceptionV3 correctly classified 25 out of 44 test images, outperforming the proposed CNN (17 correct predictions) and VGG16 (19 correct predictions). Five-fold cross-validation further confirmed the stability and relatively better performance of the InceptionV3 model. Conclusion: The comparative evaluation shows that pre-trained CNN architectures, especially InceptionV3, outperform a lightweight three-layer CNN when trained on small, balanced datasets of infected fish images. Although the proposed lightweight CNN has limited accuracy, its low computational needs suggest it could be useful in resource-limited aquaculture settings. Incorporating deep learning-based image analysis into aquaculture health monitoring systems could enable quick disease triage, support timely management decisions, and promote better biosecurity and sustainable fish production. Future research should increase the dataset size, include more fish species and disease types, and test model performance across different farming environments to improve its generalizability and practical use.

Indexed as

aquaculture disease detectionconvolutional neural networkdeep learningfish disease classificationimage-based diagnosisInceptionV3infected freshwater fishmachine learning in aquaculture

Identifiers

PMID42046675
PMCPMC13110474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.