ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2026
Barriers and Facilitators of Women's Leadership in Academic Medicine in China: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Globally, far fewer women than men are in leadership positions in academic medicine. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators of female leadership development in the Chinese medical field, identify significant factors promoting leadership development, and ultimately provide a basis for the formulation of leadership enhancement strategies. Methods: This qualitative descriptive study, grounded in an interpretivist paradigm, used purposive sampling to recruit female junior faculty members (<40 years) and senior leaders from university-affiliated hospitals in Beijing, China. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. All interviews were conducted either online or by phone in participants' preferred language (Mandarin or English). Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis, with NVivo 11.0 used to support systematic coding and data management. Results: We interviewed 18 junior faculty members and 7 senior faculty leaders from five university-affiliated hospitals in Beijing. The main outcomes of interest were barriers and facilitators to female leadership development in the Chinese medical field. Three major themes emerged: (1) the current status of women's leadership in academic medicine, characterized by the underrepresentation of women in leadership positions; (2) multi-level barriers to advancement at the policy/structural, social, and individual levels, including gendered retirement policies that truncate careers, stereotypes regarding women's professionalism and competence, disproportionate family responsibilities, and a confidence gap; and (3) essential skills, individual characteristics and facilitators for leadership development, with particular emphasis on leadership training and the importance of female role models. Conclusion: This study reveals context-specific structural barriers, such as gendered retirement policies, alongside pervasive social stereotypes within Chinese academic medicine context. Women in academic medicine continue to face systematic constraints that limit their advancement into leadership roles. A multi-level approach should be applied to mitigate informal barriers, and cultural interventions that challenge deep-seated gender norms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.