ArticleCureus2026
Retained Epidural Catheter Fragment Requiring Surgical Removal in a Patient With Multiple Comorbidities: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidural analgesia remains an important technique in many clinical settings; although generally considered safe, it is not free of complications. We present the case of a 69-year-old woman with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and hypertension who, during an epidural block for a left open hepatectomy, experienced the fracture and retention of a 10-cm epidural catheter fragment within the spinal canal at the T12-L1 level. Despite the patient being asymptomatic, surgical removal was required due to the fragment's location and length and the potential risk of long-term systemic complications associated with her comorbidities. Among the main causes of catheter retention, excessive traction during removal is one of the most frequently reported mechanisms. The management of a retained epidural catheter fragment depends on multiple variables, including fragment size, anatomical location, symptomatology, and patient comorbidities. While conservative management may be appropriate for selected asymptomatic patients with small fragments located outside the spinal canal, surgical extraction is recommended when the fragment is large, located within the spinal canal, and associated with an increased risk of infection or systemic complications or when the patient develops neurological symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.