Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046617›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Incidental Amyand's Hernia During Enhanced-View Totally Extraperitoneal (eTEP) Repair of Recurrent Inguinal Hernia: A Case Report and Technical Rationale for a Posterior Approach.

Ender Bademkiran

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ender BademkiranDepartment of General Surgery, Akhisar Mustafa Kirazoğlu State Hospital, Manisa, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incidental Amyand's hernia is a rare intraoperative finding during inguinal hernia repair and may pose a management dilemma, particularly in recurrent cases where prior anterior repair limits surgical options. In these settings, careful consideration is required for optimal plane selection and the safety of mesh placement after appendectomy. A 67-year-old man with a history of prior anterior Lichtenstein repair presented with a recurrent right inguinal hernia. A posterior laparo-endoscopic repair using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique was performed in accordance with international guidelines. During hernia sac dissection, a controlled peritoneal opening was intentionally created to safely identify the sac contents. The cecum and a macroscopically normal appendix were found within the sac, consistent with a Type I Amyand's hernia. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed, and the repair was completed in the preperitoneal space using the eTEP approach, without conversion to a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique. The postoperative course was uneventful, with no recurrence or chronic pain at six-month follow-up. This case demonstrates the utility of the eTEP approach as a posterior strategy for recurrent inguinal hernia repair when unexpected intraoperative findings occur. In selected patients with non-inflamed Amyand's hernia, appendectomy combined with prosthetic mesh repair can be performed safely without compromising outcomes.

Indexed as

amyand’s herniaetep repairlaparoscopic hernia repairminimally invasive surgeryrecurrent inguinal hernia

Identifiers

PMID42046617
PMCPMC13110896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.