ArticleCureus2026
Role of Preoperative Echocardiography in Resource-Limited Settings and Delayed Patient Care.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preoperative echocardiography has long been used as an effective diagnostic tool in the preoperative assessment of surgical candidates. In elderly patients, hip fractures represent a critical medical emergency with a high risk of complications that can occur if not addressed promptly. Unnecessary preoperative investigations may lead to delays and potentially compromise the quality of patient care. The motivation to evaluate the utility of preoperative echocardiography in select clinical scenarios, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where resources are limited, arose from the case of a 72-year-old female who presented to a tertiary hospital in Nairobi, Kenya, with a right-sided intertrochanteric hip fracture following a traumatic fall. She was physically active with metabolic equivalents of tasks (METs) ≥4 and had no significant history of cardiovascular symptoms or risk factors. Preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed and revealed T-wave inversions in leads V5-V6, prompting a request for an echocardiogram. Technical difficulties led to a delay in the procedure, postponing surgery. The patient was later deemed fit for surgery by the cardiology team without the need for an echocardiogram, and she successfully underwent an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Routine preoperative echocardiography serves minimal clinical benefit in asymptomatic and stable patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. In such patients, metabolic equivalents of tasks (METs ≥4), normal N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and cardiac troponin levels can serve as sufficiently reliable tools for preoperative cardiovascular evaluation. Unnecessary echocardiograms have been associated with surgical delays, prolonged hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Evidence-based medical practices guided by established guidelines are essential in ensuring efficient patient care. In addition to obtaining a detailed patient history and thorough physical examination, it is also crucial to inform clinicians of the selective yet valuable role of echocardiograms in the preoperative assessments of surgical patients to prevent futile interventions and delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.