ReviewCureus2026
Timing of Nasal Splint Removal After Septoplasty and Its Effects on Postoperative Functional Outcomes and Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal timing for intranasal splint removal following septoplasty remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed how splint removal timing affects postoperative pain, nasal function, olfactory performance, and complications. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (PROSPERO: CRD420251129055). Six studies from Turkey (2011-2024) involving 516 patients were included. Participants were stratified into early (days 1-3), intermediate (days 4-7), and late (>7 days) removal groups. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Results indicated that pain outcomes did not differ between early and intermediate removal, evidenced by a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.04 (p=0.80), but pain was significantly lower with late removal compared to intermediate timing (SMD 1.24, p<0.001). Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores favored early (SMD -0.57, p=0.037) and intermediate (SMD -0.73, p=0.008) removal over late removal. Olfactory function, assessed using the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) odor test, was impaired with early removal compared to intermediate (SMD -0.56, p=0.039) and late removal (SMD -0.55, p=0.045). While complications showed no significant differences among groups, septal perforation risk was higher with early removal (OR 5.69, 95% CI 0.94-34.44, p=0.059), but this difference did not reach statistical significance.Notably, all included studies were conducted in Turkey, which may limit the generalizability of these findings to other populations and clinical settings
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.