Trial reportCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
High-Intensity Alternating Current Stimulation as an Add-On to Multidisciplinary Intensive Rehabilitation for Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsIn this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, we explored whether high-intensity transcranial alternating current stimulation (Hi-tACS), as an add-on to multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation therapy (MIRT), could yield more durable quality of life (QoL) improvements than MIRT alone.
methodsSixty patients with Parkinson's disease (PwP) (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3, aged 45-70) were assigned (1:1) to receive 10 days of MIRT with either twice-daily Hi-tACS (15 mA, 77.5 Hz, 40 min/session) or sham stimulation. The primary outcome was the longitudinal change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) total score from baseline to 4, 12, and 24 weeks after intervention. Secondary outcomes included changes in motor and non-motor symptom scales. Adverse events were monitored throughout the intervention period.
resultsGeneralized estimating equation analysis revealed a significant group-by-time interaction for PDQ-39 total scores (P
conclusionsThis trial demonstrated that the Hi-tACS add-on to MIRT could maintain long-term improvements in QoL and improve non-motor symptoms for PwP, providing a new strategy for PwP rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.