ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
Development of a Novel Prognostic Inflammation Index to Predict Poor Outcomes in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Longitudinal Study.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a Novel Prognostic Inflammation Index to Predict Poor Outcomes in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Longitudinal Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is an acute cerebrovascular disease associated with high mortality and severe disability. Inflammation plays a critical role in the onset and progression of ICH. However, existing inflammatory markers have limited predictive capacity for the prognosis of ICH patients. This study aims to develop a novel Prognostic inflammation index (PII) based on leukocyte subset counts and evaluate its effectiveness in assessing the prognosis of ICH patients.
methodsA total of 1021 consecutive ICH patients hospitalized between January 2021 and June 2023 were included as the derivation cohort. In addition, an internal temporal validation cohort of 366 patients hospitalized between January 2024 and December 2024 was assembled using identical inclusion/exclusion criteria. Using reduced-rank regression (RRR) based on leukocyte subsets (including neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, eosinophils, and basophils), we constructed the PII. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to analyze the associations between PII, its dynamic trajectories, and patient outcomes, including poor prognosis, all-cause mortality, and stroke-associated infections. The predictive performance of PII was illustrated using a nomogram, and its efficacy was compared to conventional inflammatory markers through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
resultsPatients with elevated PII were significantly associated with poor outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months, stroke-associated infections, and all-cause mortality within 1 year (all p < 0.05). PII trajectory analysis revealed that patients with persistently high PII had a substantially increased risk of poor outcomes (p < 0.05). Moreover, compared to common systemic inflammatory markers such as the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and aggregate inflammation systemic index (AISI), PII showed generally favorable discriminative performance across most endpoints; however, the pairwise AUC comparisons were exploratory and some comparisons yielded borderline p values that should be interpreted cautiously.
conclusionPII, a composite inflammation index based on leukocyte subset counts, is an effective predictor of poor outcomes in ICH patients and shows favorable prognostic performance compared with traditional inflammatory markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.