Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046385›Full record

ArticlePest management science2026

A geometric and probabilistic framework for mechanistic antifungal screening from colony morphology.

Ezekiel Ahn, Insuck Baek, Seunghyun Lim, Amelia Lovelace, Masoud Kazem-Rostami, Helen Ngo, Richard D Ashby, Minhyeok Cha, Moon S Kim, Sunchung Park and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ezekiel AhnSustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States, Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4447-4104
Insuck BaekEnvironmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States, Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Seunghyun LimSustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States, Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Amelia LovelaceSustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States, Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Masoud Kazem-RostamiSustainable Biofuels and Co-Products Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, PA, USA.
Helen NgoSustainable Biofuels and Co-Products Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, PA, USA.
Richard D AshbySustainable Biofuels and Co-Products Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, PA, USA.
Minhyeok ChaEnvironmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States, Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Moon S KimEnvironmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States, Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Sunchung ParkSustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States, Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-9476
Lyndel W MeinhardtSustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States, Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.

Funding

Agricultural Research ServiceNational Institute of Food and Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFungicide discovery still relies heavily on scalar screening endpoints [e.g. inhibition zones, median effective concentration (EC

resultsFrom routine colony images, we computed a fixed-dose potency coordinate, λ, as the negative natural log of the area survival ratio, and a polarity coordinate, I, as the natural log fold-change in length-to-width ratio (treated/control). We then estimated polarity-disruption event probability (p̂) with exact 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence bounds at an operational threshold of τ = 1.10, with sensitivity analysis across τ = 1.10-1.20. In a single-dose primary screen across nine isolates and four phenolic-branched amide/acid candidates, amides consistently clustered in the (+λ, +I) quadrant, indicating an action direction characterized by concurrent growth suppression and polarity disruption relative to the acid analogues. The strongest combination was CGH5 treated with PhSOAM (λ = 0.67), which also showed high shape-disruption probability (p̂ = 0.75; 95% CI 0.43-0.95). Ellipse-based axis reconstruction linked I to axis-specific contraction ratios and showed strong agreement with direct length- and width-based ratios. Re-analysis of an independent UV-C exposure-time gradient (0-30 min) produced coherent dose-dependent λ(d) and I(d) trajectories and supported event-level inference at ~10 min.

conclusionThe λ-I-p grammar converts colony images into an instrument-agnostic screening language describing how strongly an intervention acts at the tested condition (λ), whether it is associated with polarity-linked geometry change (I) and how often a defined failure mode occurs (p̂), thereby supporting mechanistic screening and prioritization of candidate fungicides. Published 2026. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Fungicides, IndustrialFusariumCacaoMicrobial Sensitivity TestsFungicides, Industrialanisotropyantifungal mode‐of‐actioncrop protectionevent‐level statisticsfungicide screeningimage‐based assaymorphology‐based phenotyping

Identifiers

PMID42046385
PMCPMC13352249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.