ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026
Analysis of Mandatory Post-Marketing Surveillance Studies Supports Revised Regulatory Requirements in Korea.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this analysis was to determine the contribution to the understanding of product benefit/risk made by non-randomized, observational post-marketing surveillance (PMS) studies previously required by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) re-examination system and conducted by Pfizer in Korea over 2000-2024.
methodsA retrospective analysis of all Pfizer Korea PMS studies during 2000-2024 was performed, covering a wide range of therapy areas. Available Pfizer clinical study reports and re-examination reports were reviewed for sample sizes, study periods, and key safety and effectiveness findings.
resultsTwenty-four studies that enrolled 21 179 Korean participants were identified. Original sample sizes assigned by MFDS were typically either 600 or 3000 participants, but enrollment challenges were common and approximately half of the PMS studies were permitted to reduce sample size. Mean study duration (FSFV-LSLV) was 3.8 years. Safety findings were consistent with existing global safety data, with no clinically significant new safety information being generated from the PMS studies.
conclusionsPMS conducted by Pfizer in Korea were often challenging to recruit and generated data that were consistent with prior global data, with no evidence of clinically meaningful differences in Korean patients. These findings support MFDS's recent transition to a risk management plan (RMP) framework, with PMS only as needed, reducing mandatory requirements for newly approved drug products. Furthermore, when a PMS study is necessary to address a specific scientific uncertainty, MFDS allows individual determination of the sample size, which will improve the feasibility of conducting the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.