Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046371›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026

Analysis of Mandatory Post-Marketing Surveillance Studies Supports Revised Regulatory Requirements in Korea.

Kevin Wolter, Seung-Hee Jeong, Ju-Won Woo, Eunsol Kim, Yoosun Lee, Sera Cha, Evelyn Moy, Rod Junor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin WolterInternal Medicine, Pfizer Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Seung-Hee JeongReal World Evidence Generation, Pfizer Research and Development, Seoul, Korea.
Ju-Won WooReal World Evidence Generation, Pfizer Research and Development, Seoul, Korea.
Eunsol KimReal World Evidence Generation, Pfizer Research and Development, Seoul, Korea.
Yoosun LeeReal World Evidence Generation, Pfizer Research and Development, Seoul, Korea.
Sera ChaReal World Evidence Generation, Pfizer Research and Development, Seoul, Korea.
Evelyn MoyPortfolio Management, Pfizer Research and Development, New York, New York, USA.
Rod JunorInternal Medicine, Pfizer Research and Development, Surrey, UK.

Funding

Pfizer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this analysis was to determine the contribution to the understanding of product benefit/risk made by non-randomized, observational post-marketing surveillance (PMS) studies previously required by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) re-examination system and conducted by Pfizer in Korea over 2000-2024.

methodsA retrospective analysis of all Pfizer Korea PMS studies during 2000-2024 was performed, covering a wide range of therapy areas. Available Pfizer clinical study reports and re-examination reports were reviewed for sample sizes, study periods, and key safety and effectiveness findings.

resultsTwenty-four studies that enrolled 21 179 Korean participants were identified. Original sample sizes assigned by MFDS were typically either 600 or 3000 participants, but enrollment challenges were common and approximately half of the PMS studies were permitted to reduce sample size. Mean study duration (FSFV-LSLV) was 3.8 years. Safety findings were consistent with existing global safety data, with no clinically significant new safety information being generated from the PMS studies.

conclusionsPMS conducted by Pfizer in Korea were often challenging to recruit and generated data that were consistent with prior global data, with no evidence of clinically meaningful differences in Korean patients. These findings support MFDS's recent transition to a risk management plan (RMP) framework, with PMS only as needed, reducing mandatory requirements for newly approved drug products. Furthermore, when a PMS study is necessary to address a specific scientific uncertainty, MFDS allows individual determination of the sample size, which will improve the feasibility of conducting the study.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsHumansRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesSample SizeKoreaMFDS requirementspost‐authorization safety studiespost‐marketing surveillance studies

Identifiers

PMID42046371
PMCPMC13121920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.