ArticlemAbs2026
Engineering of acidic pH-responsive anti-CD3 binding antibodies.
Article in mAbs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Narrative review of research progress and future development of bispecific antibodies in lung cancer: opportunities and challenges.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Next-generation T cell engagers for cancer and autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of anti-CD3 antibody-based T cell engager therapeutics has improved the treatment of various malignancies, yet the challenge of achieving tumor-specific targeting while minimizing on-target off-tumor effects in normal tissues remains a substantial hurdle. One promising strategy to address this issue involves engineering antibodies with conditional pH-dependent binding affinities, capitalizing on the acidic microenvironment characteristics of tumors (pH ~ 6.5-6.8) compared to the neutral pH of healthy tissues (pH ~ 7.4). In this study, we focus on the pH-engineering of antibody binders against the human CD3 antigen, a critical component of T cell activation, to achieve preferential binding at acidic pH. Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on the reported CD3ɛ antibody binder 40G5c, we shed light on possible molecular mechanisms of the pH-responsiveness of key mutations and their impact on the overall binder structure at physiological or acidic pH. Our study highlights how MD has emerged as a powerful tool to guide and explain intrinsic pH-dependent molecular mechanisms in antibody engineering. Lastly, we report that our engineered CD3 binders preferentially bind and activate T cells under acidic pH conditions and display favorable affinity and pH-window profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.