Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046216›Full record

ArticleNursing open2026

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Role Performance Scale for Patient Safety Coordinators: Secondary Data Analysis.

Kyo-Yeon Park, Kyoungrim Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyo-Yeon ParkCollege of Nursing, Pusan National University, Yangsan-Si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-9889
Kyoungrim KangCollege of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Pusan National University, Yangsan-Si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4187-1147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop and validate a scale for predicting and evaluating the role of patient safety coordinators by assessing construct validity and reliability using confirmatory factor analysis.

designA methodological study utilising secondary data analysis.

methodsThis methodological study used secondary data from online surveys of 132 patient safety coordinators in small- and medium-sized hospitals. The 25-item Role Performance Scale, covering four subscales, was validated through confirmatory factor analysis to assess structural validity. Reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity were also examined.

resultsThe developed 25-item Role Performance Scale comprised four subscales: Information collection and management, education-related tasks, patient safety improvement activities, and indicator management. The scale demonstrated strong reliability and validity, with construct reliability values exceeding 0.7 and convergent validity confirmed. Discriminant validity was established as the variance extracted values surpassed inter-factor correlations. The overall reliability of the scale was high, confirming internal consistency.

conclusionThe developed scale for patient safety coordinators demonstrated strong validity and reliability, offering an objective assessment method for evaluating key patient safety coordinator tasks and strengthening professional competencies to enhance patient safety systems. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPsychometricsAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSecondary Data AnalysisSurveys and Questionnairesconfirmatory factor analysispatient safety coordinatorrole performancescale

Identifiers

PMID42046216
PMCPMC13121552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.