ArticleArtificial organs2026
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Functional Differences Between In Vivo Human Kidneys and Discarded Human Kidneys During Ex Vivo Normothermic Machine Perfusion.
Article in Artificial organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith increasing interest in renal normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), a deeper understanding of ex vivo renal physiology is essential to establish NMP as a robust pre-transplant assessment platform. This study utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare in vivo renal physiology in healthy volunteers with ex vivo renal function of human donor kidneys during NMP.
methodsMultiparametric MRI maps assessing water diffusion, oxygenation, tissue characteristics, and perfusion were obtained from 11 healthy volunteers to define an in vivo renal reference frame. For ex vivo evaluation, 25 discarded human donor kidneys underwent 4 h of oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion, followed by 6 h of NMP in an MRI-compatible setup. The kidneys were assessed hourly using comparable MRI modalities as in vivo.
resultsEx vivo renal physiology was substantially different from in vivo physiology in terms of MRI-based diffusion patterns, oxygenation, tissue characteristics, and tissue perfusion. Most MRI measurements did not correlate well with conventional parameters such as flow, renal function, and injury markers during NMP.
conclusionsOur findings highlight distinct differences between in vivo and ex vivo MRI-based renal characteristics in a human cohort, suggesting that parameters beyond conventional in vivo functional markers may warrant consideration when evaluating organ viability during NMP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.