Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046163›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2026

Specializing in order to generalize: fidelity to foraging areas is modulated by flexible fine-scale habitat use in Hudsonian Whimbrel (Numenius hudsonicus).

Maina C Handmaker, Felicia J Sanders, Madelyn B Kaplin, Adam D Smith, Ethan P Shealy, Natasza Fontaine, Janet M Thibault, Mary Catherine Martin, Camille Duquet, Abby V Sterling and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maina C HandmakerDepartment of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA, 01003-9285, USA. mhandmaker@umass.edu.
Felicia J SandersSouth Carolina Department of Natural Resources, McClellanville, SC, USA.
Madelyn B KaplinDepartment of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA, 01003-9285, USA.
Adam D SmithAmerican Bird Conservancy, The Plains, VA, USA.
Ethan P ShealySavannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC, USA.
Natasza FontaineColorado Parks and Wildlife, Grand Junction, CO, USA.
Janet M ThibaultSouth Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Charleston, SC, USA.
Mary Catherine MartinSouth Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Charleston, SC, USA.
Camille DuquetSouth Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Charleston, SC, USA.
Abby V SterlingManoment Conservation Sciences, Manomet, MA, USA.
Nathan R SennerDepartment of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA, 01003-9285, USA.

Funding

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation 67006National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program 1938059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany mobile organisms exhibit fidelity to specific foraging areas across seasons and years. Those that are both site faithful and habitat specialists may be particularly vulnerable to habitat loss and disturbance, as they may be less able to adjust their habitat use in response to environmental change. However, site fidelity can sometimes be a strategy to maximize efficiency via site familiarity rather than specialization, enabling more flexible habitat use at finer spatial scales.

methodsWe used high-resolution GPS tracking data, remote sensing imagery, and focal foraging observations to measure individual habitat specialization and its potential tradeoffs in Hudsonian Whimbrel (Numenius hudsonicus), a species that exhibits high individual foraging site fidelity in a spatiotemporally patchy intertidal environment during a month-long migratory stopover.

resultsWe found that Whimbrel show low levels of habitat specialization and instead select habitat in proportion to its availability within their home range and its accessibility based on tidal inundation. Each habitat type, however, has associated tradeoffs between accessibility, foraging reward, and predation risk. Flexible habitat use is therefore likely a means to balance these tradeoffs.

conclusionsWe posit that fidelity at the home range scale allows individuals to develop familiarity with how to balance habitat quality tradeoffs in a dynamic environment. While this inherent behavioral flexibility could buffer Hudsonian Whimbrel from the risks of environmental change, their reliance on low-lying intertidal habitats raises concerns as sea-level rise increasingly restricts the availability of their preferred foraging habitats. More broadly, investigating the interplay between fidelity and flexibility is critical for assessing how site-faithful species might cope with rapidly changing environments.

Indexed as

Foraging ecologyHabitat selectionSite fidelitySpecializationStopover ecology

Identifiers

PMID42046163
PMCPMC13255295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.