ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Health Care Policy Implementation Trial of Primary Human Papillomavirus-Based Cervical Screening in Denmark.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On mandate from the Danish Health Authority, a nationwide health care policy trial (HCP) of primary HPV screening for women aged 30-59 was initiated in 2021. The aim was to inform on the performance of HPV screening in comparison to existing cytology practice. The HCP trial included all Danish women between 30 and 59 years of age undergoing cervical cancer screening in 2021 (n = 178,323). Women with odd birthdays were screened with HPV screening (n = 91,517), while women born on even dates were screened with cytology (n = 86,806). The follow-up period was individually censored at 18 months from the screening date. Outcomes and intention-to-treat analysis are reported. Overall, 9.1% and 3.0% were HPV or cytology positive on the index sample. Referral to colposcopy upon index sample was 1.9% with HPV and 2.1% with cytology screening. Referral to retest after a positive HPV index sample result was 7.7 higher for HPV than cytology. Combining index and retest rounds, 6.3% women had colposcopy in the HPV arm (RR 1.28) versus 4,9% in the cytology arm. HPV screening detected both more disease ≥ CIN2 (RR 1.51) and ≥ CIN3 (RR1.35). The national-scale health care policy implementation trial showed that HPV-based cervical cancer screening increased detection of histologically defined disease compared to the previous policy of cytology-based screening for women 30-59 years of age. The HCP demonstrated the real-life effect of HPV-based screening over cytology-based screening in detection of disease, but also details what to be expected in terms of health care resource requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.