ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2026
Gastric cancer susceptibility mapping using GIS and machine learning in East Azerbaijan province, Iran.
Article in International journal of health geographics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite technological advancements, Gastric Cancer (GC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. This study aimed to map spatial risk susceptibility for GC in East Azerbaijan province, located in northwest Iran, which ranks second nationally in GC incidence. In the first step, the residential addresses of 2,884 patients diagnosed with GC between 2015 and 2019 were geocoded using Google Earth, converting them into geographic coordinates for spatial analysis. The dataset was subsequently divided into two subsets: 80% of the cases were allocated for model training and 20% for validation. A set of environmental variables including elevation, rainfall, iron, volcanoes, copper, coal, Pb-Zn, arsenic, and mercury along with two models of Logistic Regression (LR) and Logistic Model Tree (LMT) was used to map areas susceptible to GC. The performance of the models was evaluated using Area Under the Curve (AUC) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) methods. The findings revealed that central regions of the study area are the hotspots for occurrence of the disease. Both LR and LMT models pinpointed nine counties as high-risk and susceptible areas for GC, while five counties were categorized as low-risk areas. In addition, evaluation of RMSE and AUC metrics showed that the LR model outperformed the LMT model across the study area. More results revealed that spatial clustering of GC cases in areas with higher rainfall and closer proximity to heavy metal deposits, supporting the hypothesis that environmental exposure contributes to disease risk. This study is useful for environmental health researchers, and regional public‑health authorities to locate high‑risk areas, prioritize screening, and allocate diagnostic and treatment resources efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.