ArticleBMC nursing2026
Research on the design and innovative transformation path of shoulder rehabilitation wall-climbing ladders for postoperative breast cancer patients based on design thinking.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a shoulder rehabilitation wall-climbing ladder for postoperative breast cancer patients using a design thinking–driven approach, and to evaluate its usability, feasibility, and translational application in clinical and home settings.
methodsThis study integrated a design thinking framework (Empathize–Define–Ideate–Prototype–Test) with real-world implementation. Clinical observations, literature review, and semi-structured interviews with patients and nurses were conducted to identify limitations of existing wall-climbing approaches and define core design requirements. Following iterative prototyping and optimisation, the final product was implemented across multiple hospitals. Patient satisfaction and nurse user experience were assessed using self-developed questionnaires.
resultsThe device was implemented in 148 hospitals, with 5,555 units distributed. A total of 199 patients reported a mean satisfaction score of 42.66 ± 5.30 (out of 50), with 86.0% indicating high satisfaction. Among 119 nurses, the mean user experience score was 47.88 ± 3.49, with 96.6% reporting high endorsement. Users highlighted ease of use, improved comfort, and facilitation of standardized rehabilitation and home-based exercise. Suggested improvements focused on enhancing quantitative assessment and recording functions.
conclusionThis study demonstrates a feasible nursing innovation pathway integrating design thinking with real-world implementation. The device shows good usability in both ward and home settings and may support standardized postoperative rehabilitation after breast cancer surgery. Further studies are needed to evaluate its clinical effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.