Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046094›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Common learning activities, teaching strategies, and facilitation practices in interprofessional education-a scoping review.

Alice Mei Ling Chan, Agnes Wing Ki Yip, Jasmine Cheung, Julia Sze Wing Wong, James Tse Wai Cheng, Shun Chan, Rick Yiu Cho Kwan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alice Mei Ling ChanSchool of Nursing, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong, China. alicechan@twc.edu.hk.
Agnes Wing Ki YipSchool of Nursing, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong, China.
Jasmine CheungSchool of Nursing, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong, China.
Julia Sze Wing WongSchool of Nursing, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong, China.
James Tse Wai ChengSchool of Nursing, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong, China.
Shun ChanSchool of Nursing, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong, China.
Rick Yiu Cho KwanSchool of Nursing, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong, China. rickkwan@twc.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile many studies have highlighted the benefits of interprofessional education, including improved teamwork, knowledge, and collaborative skills, little is known about which activities or learning strategies are the most commonly employed or effective. Various learning activities are used in interprofessional education. Studies have highlighted a trend toward developing frameworks for interprofessional education; however, these often lack specificity regarding key training elements. The learning activities, teaching strategies, and facilitation practices must be further explored to provide informed recommendations for faculties when designing interprofessional training activities.

objectivesTo map the learning activities and teaching strategies included in interprofessional education programs for undergraduate healthcare students and examine common facilitation practices.

designA scoping review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist.

methodsA systematic search of four electronic databases was conducted. The study inclusion criteria followed the Population, Concept, and Context framework; healthcare undergraduate students who participated in interactive interprofessional training activities were included.

resultsForty-one studies were included for review. Nine types of learning activities in four categories were identified. Case-based discussion was the most commonly used activity type, possibly because it could be used to meet the needs of diverse learners. Six types of teaching strategies were used in the included studies: 1) establishing a clear topic of learning; 2) offering pre-reading materials on the topic; 3) reviewing the roles and responsibilities of each profession; 4) participating in a collaborative activity; 5) ensuring the extent of consensus between faculties; and 6) conducting a debriefing for reflection. Only nine studies documented the participants’ perspectives on the facilitator-to-student ratio and the facilitators’ roles and responsibilities, which would influence students’ learning experiences.

conclusionsPrevious studies have identified a diverse array of learning activities and teaching strategies. Case-based discussion was found to be the most commonly used, possibly because its flexibility in accommodating various professionals and settings enables it to meet the needs of diverse learners. Facilitation is an important but under-recognized aspect of interprofessional education, and future descriptions of educational interventions should provide specific details to help guide others in following best practices.

Indexed as

Interprofessional EducationInterprofessional RelationsLearningProblem-Based LearningTeachingCooperative BehaviorCurriculumHumansCase-based discussionFacilitator trainingInterprofessional educationLearning activitiesTeaching strategies

Identifiers

PMID42046094
PMCPMC13173796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.