ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Association of lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio with new-onset acute respiratory distress syndrome and all-cause mortality in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study based on the MIMIC-IV database.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-to-albumin (ALB) ratio (LDAR) has been widely recognized as a prognostic biomarker; however, its association with the incidence of new-onset acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and subsequent outcomes among patients with sepsis remains insufficiently characterized. This study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV(MIMIC-IV)database to elucidate the relationship between LDAR and the occurrence of ARDS, as well as short- and long-term mortality, in individuals with sepsis.
methodsAdult patients diagnosed with sepsis were identified from the MIMIC-IV database. Participants were stratified into quartiles based on log₂-transformed LDAR (log₂LDAR). Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were employed to evaluate the association between log₂LDAR and new-onset ARDS. Among patients with ARDS, Cox proportional hazards models and RCS analyses were applied to examine the association between log₂LDAR and all-cause mortality (ACM). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of new-onset ARDS; secondary endpoints included 30-day, 90-day, and one-year ACM.
results2,775 septic patients were included, with an incidence of new-onset ARDS of 40.39% (1,121/2,775). After adjustment for potential confounders, patients in the highest quartile of log₂LDAR (Q4) demonstrated a markedly higher likelihood of developing ARDS compared with those in the lowest quartile (Q1) (OR = 1.529, 95% CI: 1.165–2.009, p = 0.002). RCS analysis revealed a linear positive association between log₂LDAR and ARDS occurrence. Among patients with ARDS, elevated log₂LDAR was associated with increased mortality risk: as a continuous variable, it was correlated with 30-day (HR = 1.169, 95% CI: 1.064–1.284, p < 0.001), 90-day, and one-year ACM; as a categorical variable, the 30-day ACM risk in the highest quartile was 2.125-fold that of the lowest quartile (HR = 2.125, 95% CI: 1.464–3.086, p < 0.001), with similar trends observed for 90-day and one-year ACM. RCS analysis indicated a nonlinear relationship between log₂LDAR and ACM. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses excluding patients who developed ARDS within 6 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission further confirmed the robustness of the aforementioned associations.
conclusionAn elevated LDAR represents an important indicator of increased ARDS risk among patients with sepsis and is associated with unfavorable short- and long-term survival outcomes in those with sepsis-associated ARDS.
trial registrationNot applicable. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.