Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Prevention of sickness absence through early identification and rehabilitation of at-risk patients with musculoskeletal disorders (PREVSAM): 12-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03913325 (Early Identification of Risk for and Prevention of Sickness Absence Due to Musculoskeletal Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Identification of Risk for and Prevention of Sickness Absence Due to Musculoskeletal Pain (PREVSAM) - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe team-based, interdisciplinary rehabilitation model, PREVention of Sickness Absence for Musculoskeletal disorders (PREVSAM), was developed and evaluated in a Swedish primary care context. The purpose of this follow-up study was to assess 12-month effects of rehabilitation according to the PREVSAM model on sickness absence and patient-reported health outcomes in patients initially assessed as being at increased risk for sickness absence.
methodsThis was a two-armed randomised controlled trial at eight primary care rehabilitation clinics, comparing rehabilitation according to the PREVSAM model with treatment as usual (TAU). In this 12-month follow-up, sickness absence and patient-reported health outcomes were assessed in 249 participants. Analyses were performed using logistic regression, zero-inflated negative binomial regression, and Cox regression.
resultsMost participants remained in full- or part-time work (PREVSAM 67.7%, TAU 60.7%) and had zero registered sickness benefit days during the 12 months’ follow-up period (PREVSAM Md;0; IQR 0-10.5, TAU 0;0-20.4), with no statistically significant difference between the groups. Improvements over time were seen in all patient-reported outcomes in both groups, but no significant between-group differences were found.
conclusionsThe PREVSAM model was not shown to be more effective than TAU in reducing sickness absence amongst patients with musculoskeletal disorders who were identified to be at risk for long-term sick leave or to reduce risk for sickness absence. Patient-related health outcomes improved significantly over time in both groups, suggesting that the interventions, regardless of type, contributed positively to participants’ health and recovery. The findings are nevertheless encouraging as most participants—regardless of group—remained in full- or part-time work, with no registered sickness benefit days during the 12 months’ follow-up period. This finding suggests that most individuals who initially present with risk factors for long-term pain and sick leave do not go on to develop prolonged sickness absence.
trial registrationThe trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Protocol ID: NCT03913325. Study Registration Date, First Submitted 09/04/2019, First Posted 12/04/2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.