Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046075›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Prevention of sickness absence through early identification and rehabilitation of at-risk patients with musculoskeletal disorders (PREVSAM): 12-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

Maria Eh Larsson, Annika Ekhammar, Rode Grönkvist, Lena Bornhöft, Lena Nordeman, Kristina Holmgren, Anna Grimby-Ekman, Gunnel Hensing, Cecilia Björkelund, Stefan Bergman and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03913325 (Early Identification of Risk for and Prevention of Sickness Absence Due to Musculoskeletal Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03913325 naunknown statusnot on this map

Early Identification of Risk for and Prevention of Sickness Absence Due to Musculoskeletal Pain (PREVSAM) - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVastra Gotaland RegionRan2019 to 2024Enrolled254ConditionsMusculoskeletal DisorderArmsPREVSAM model, Treatment as usual (standard treatment)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maria Eh LarssonResearch, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden. maria.eh.larsson@vgregion.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1225-9736
Annika EkhammarResearch, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5619-9055
Rode GrönkvistSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3704-4268
Lena BornhöftResearch, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-658X
Lena NordemanResearch, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4691-9330
Kristina HolmgrenDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation/Unit of Occupational Therapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0061-5550
Anna Grimby-EkmanSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9408-6065
Gunnel HensingSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3457-2993
Cecilia BjörkelundGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4083-7342
Stefan BergmanGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6294-538X
Maria DottoriResearch, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-7000
Susanne BernhardssonResearch, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-7678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe team-based, interdisciplinary rehabilitation model, PREVention of Sickness Absence for Musculoskeletal disorders (PREVSAM), was developed and evaluated in a Swedish primary care context. The purpose of this follow-up study was to assess 12-month effects of rehabilitation according to the PREVSAM model on sickness absence and patient-reported health outcomes in patients initially assessed as being at increased risk for sickness absence.

methodsThis was a two-armed randomised controlled trial at eight primary care rehabilitation clinics, comparing rehabilitation according to the PREVSAM model with treatment as usual (TAU). In this 12-month follow-up, sickness absence and patient-reported health outcomes were assessed in 249 participants. Analyses were performed using logistic regression, zero-inflated negative binomial regression, and Cox regression.

resultsMost participants remained in full- or part-time work (PREVSAM 67.7%, TAU 60.7%) and had zero registered sickness benefit days during the 12 months’ follow-up period (PREVSAM Md;0; IQR 0-10.5, TAU 0;0-20.4), with no statistically significant difference between the groups. Improvements over time were seen in all patient-reported outcomes in both groups, but no significant between-group differences were found.

conclusionsThe PREVSAM model was not shown to be more effective than TAU in reducing sickness absence amongst patients with musculoskeletal disorders who were identified to be at risk for long-term sick leave or to reduce risk for sickness absence. Patient-related health outcomes improved significantly over time in both groups, suggesting that the interventions, regardless of type, contributed positively to participants’ health and recovery. The findings are nevertheless encouraging as most participants—regardless of group—remained in full- or part-time work, with no registered sickness benefit days during the 12 months’ follow-up period. This finding suggests that most individuals who initially present with risk factors for long-term pain and sick leave do not go on to develop prolonged sickness absence.

trial registrationThe trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Protocol ID: NCT03913325. Study Registration Date, First Submitted 09/04/2019, First Posted 12/04/2019.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesSick LeaveAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRisk FactorsSwedenTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeInterdisciplinary teamworkMusculoskeletal painOccupational therapyPhysiotherapyPrimary careSecondary preventionSickness absence

Identifiers

PMID42046075
PMCPMC13123168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.