ArticleBMC surgery2026
Feasibility and safety of transumbilical single-incision laparoendoscopic surgery for giant choledochal cysts in infants: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Robot-Versus Laparoscopy-Assisted Resection of Choledochal Cysts in Infants Aged Less than 3 Months.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRadical resection of giant choledochal cysts (diameter ≥ 10 cm) in infants presents technical challenges, particularly when attempted with minimally invasive approaches. The primary difficulty lies in the cyst’s mass effect in the limited abdominal space. Although transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) offers potential cosmetic and minimally invasive advantages, evidence regarding its feasibility and safety for managing these giant cysts remains limited.
methodsThis single-center, retrospective study with a historical control group included infants who underwent radical excision for giant choledochal cysts between June 2016 and December 2024. The final follow-up date for the full cohort was September 30, 2025. All patients were assigned to either the LESS group (n = 9) or the open surgery cohort (n = 18), which served as the historical control. During transumbilical LESS, we relied on cyst decompression and a novel “relay suspension technique”. This combination effectively facilitated intraoperative exposure. Perioperative and follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe two groups were comparable in baseline characteristics. Operative time was longer in the LESS group (median 3.4 h vs. 2.5 h; p = 0.006). However, patients benefited from reduced intraoperative blood loss (median 10.0 ml vs. 20.0 ml; p < 0.001), shorter postoperative fasting time (median 2.0 days vs. 3.0 days; p = 0.011), and shorter duration of abdominal drainage (median 0.0 days vs. 4.0 days; p = 0.001). The two groups demonstrated comparable postoperative hospital stays and complication rates. All LESS procedures were completed without conversion to open surgery. At a median follow-up of 33 months, no late complications occurred in the LESS group, and cosmetic outcomes were favorable.
conclusionsIn this preliminary single-center retrospective study, the transumbilical LESS approach was supplemented by cyst decompression and a “relay suspension technique.” For specific infants with giant choledochal cysts, this approach appears to be a feasible and safe minimally invasive option. But this conclusion is based on procedures performed by experienced teams at specialized centers. This approach offers potential advantages in blood loss and early recovery. At a median follow-up of 33 months, cosmetic and long-term outcomes are favorable. While these findings are encouraging, they should be considered preliminary pending validation in larger, prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.