ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Readiness for prehospital point-of-care ultrasound among EMS personnel in a system where ultrasound is not yet implemented: a national cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in emergency and critical care for rapid, radiation-free bedside imaging. However, its integration into prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) remains inconsistent, particularly in paramedic-based systems where physician support is limited. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and readiness of EMS personnel toward adopting POCUS in a national prehospital system where ultrasound has not yet been implemented.
methodsA descriptive, cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and August 2023 among prehospital EMS professionals working in Türkiye’s national emergency medical services system, where prehospital ultrasound is not routinely implemented. A 27-item online questionnaire assessed demographics, previous ultrasound training and use, perceived diagnostic applications, and barriers to field implementation. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and compared using chi-square tests, while qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis.
resultsA total of 156 EMS professionals participated, most being paramedics (73.1%) working in urban settings (58.3%). Only 21.2% had prior ultrasound training and 22.4% hands-on experience. Nevertheless, 95.5% expressed willingness to receive training, and 90.4% reported interest in using POCUS during prehospital care. The most prioritized applications were intra-abdominal hemorrhage (96.2%), pneumothorax (82.7%), aortic aneurysm (85.3%), and cardiac tamponade (80.1%). Key barriers included lack of equipment, limited training opportunities, and lack of clear regulatory guidelines and defined scope of practice for EMS personnel regarding ultrasound use.
conclusionEMS personnel in a paramedic-based prehospital system demonstrated high readiness but limited exposure to POCUS. Structured training programs, pilot implementation projects, and clear regulatory frameworks may support the safe and effective integration of ultrasound into prehospital emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.