Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42045974›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

The relationship between deviant peer affiliation and psychological distress among college students: a moderated mediation model.

Ting Jiang, Xi Fang, Ziying Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ting JiangFaculty of Education, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Xi FangFaculty of Education, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. fangxi1982@126.com.
Ziying PanThe Sixth School of Clinical Medical, The Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital(Qingyuan People's Hospital), Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan, 511518, China.

Funding

the 2024 July Batch of the Ministry of Education's Industry-University-Research Cooperation and Collaborative Education Project 241003221244131the Fourth Phase of the Ministry of Education's Supply-Demand Docking Employment and Education Project 2024120238687the Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China 22&ZD043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examined the mechanisms linking deviant peer affiliation to psychological distress among college students.

methodsA sample of 900 college students completed measures of deviant peer affiliation, stressful life events, perceived social support, and psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and stress).

results(1) deviant peer affiliation significantly predicted higher levels of psychological distress, (2) this association was partially mediated by stressful life events, and (3) perceived social support moderated the relationship between stressful life events and psychological distress. Specifically, the positive association between stressful life events and psychological distress was stronger among students with lower perceived social support.

conclusionsThese findings suggest an indirect association involving stressful life events and a buffering pattern involving perceived social support in the link between deviant peer affiliation and psychological distress among college students, providing preliminary implications for understanding peer-related risk and protection in college student mental health.

Indexed as

Peer GroupPsychological DistressSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalStudentsAdolescentAdultAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsLife Change EventsMaleMediation AnalysisSocial GroupCollege studentDeviant peer affiliationPerceived social supportPsychological distressStressful life events

Identifiers

PMID42045974
PMCPMC13251257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.