Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42045915›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Using explainable AI to identify disease-relevant and deep brain stimulation treatment-sensitive gait features in Parkinson's disease.

Zhongke Mei, Alain Ryser, Gianluca Amprimo, Jinhao Wang, Julia Vogt, Deepak K Ravi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhongke MeiLaboratory for Movement Biomechanics, Institute for Biomechanics, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Alain RyserMedical Data Science, Institute for Machine Learning, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gianluca AmprimoDepartment of Control and Computer Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Jinhao WangLaboratory for Movement Biomechanics, Institute for Biomechanics, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Julia VogtMedical Data Science, Institute for Machine Learning, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Deepak K RaviLaboratory for Movement Biomechanics, Institute for Biomechanics, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. deepak.ravi@hest.ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGait impairment is a hallmark motor deficit of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and represents an important, yet insufficiently understood, target of subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS). Although DBS can improve several motor symptoms, identifying robust and physiologically meaningful gait biomarkers that capture both disease-related deficits and stimulation-induced improvements remains a major challenge. In particular, conventional mean-based gait metrics often fail to fully characterize pathological gait or treatment responsiveness.

methodsWe analyzed 35 spatiotemporal gait parameters obtained during continuous walking from individuals with PD assessed before and after subthalamic DBS, alongside age-matched healthy controls. Multiple machine learning classifiers were evaluated to discriminate between groups, with extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) achieving the best performance. To enhance interpretability and reduce redundancy among correlated parameters, grouped SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to rank feature importance and guide feature selection.

resultsFeature selection consistently highlighted step width variability, step width asymmetry, bilateral interlimb coordination, and the anteroposterior margin of stability as the most discriminative parameters. A compact set of five overlapping features after selection not only reliably distinguished PD gait from healthy controls but also demonstrated a shift toward healthy ranges following DBS. Importantly, these selected features outperformed conventional mean-based metrics in capturing both pathological gait characteristics and treatment-related changes. DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate that explainable artificial intelligence approaches can identify physiologically grounded gait features that may serve as candidate markers of both PD severity and DBS responsiveness. By emphasizing variability, asymmetry, coordination, and dynamic stability measures, this approach moves beyond traditional mean-based metrics and provides more sensitive markers of neuromodulation effects. These results support the use of interpretable machine learning frameworks to enable more precise evaluation of DBS outcomes and may contribute to individualized patient management strategies in Parkinson’s disease.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep Brain StimulationGait Disorders, NeurologicParkinson DiseaseAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedDeep brain stimulationGait characteristicsMachine learningParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID42045915
PMCPMC13262400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.