ArticleBMC medicine2026
Peripheral blood biomarkers RCAN1, Clusterin, RAGE, and malondialdehyde for early diagnosis and progression of Alzheimer's disease.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis often relies on invasive or costly techniques such as cerebrospinal fluid sampling and PET imaging. Peripheral blood biomarkers could offer a minimally invasive and accessible alternative. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of four candidate biomarkers—Clusterin, RCAN1, RAGE, and MDA—in the context of cognitive decline, and to generate a predictive model for AD diagnosis.
methodsWe conducted longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses among participants in the Vallecas Project (Spain). For longitudinal analyses, 52 subjects with paired baseline and 5-year follow-up samples were classified as stable cognitively healthy controls, MCI converters, or AD progression. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted using a single observation per subject (n = 83) selected to reduce age differences between the three groups, although AD patients were significantly older. Biomarker levels were measured in plasma or serum by ELISA (Clusterin, RCAN1, RAGE) or UPLC (MDA). A predictive model for AD diagnosis was developed using penalized logistic regression based on baseline data from 76 subjects, incorporating biomarkers, age, sex, and APOE ε4 genotype.
resultsIn the longitudinal analysis, RCAN1 levels decreased significantly over time in cognitively stable controls, whereas Clusterin levels decreased in the AD progression group. No significant longitudinal changes were observed in MCI converters. In the cross-sectional analysis, RCAN1 and MDA levels were significantly lower in AD patients than in cognitively healthy controls and MCI patients. RAGE levels showed a trend toward reduction in MCI but did not remain significant. At baseline, cognitively healthy individuals who later converted to MCI exhibited higher MDA levels and lower RAGE levels than stable controls. The predictive model achieved a mean cross-validated accuracy of approximately 92% and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94–0.96), with good calibration.
conclusionsRCAN1, Clusterin, RAGE, and MDA show potential as peripheral biomarkers for monitoring and early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. Longitudinal and cross-sectional alterations in these markers suggest that biochemical changes may precede clinical symptoms. A multivariable predictive model combining biomarkers with demographic and genetic factors demonstrated robust discriminative performance, supporting the potential utility of minimally invasive blood-based screening tools for AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.