ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026
Early infliximab rescue therapy is associated with reduced length of stay in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative outcomes of advanced medical rescue therapies in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Managing Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in 2025 and Beyond.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPatients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) inadequately responding to intravenous steroids commonly require rescue therapy, most commonly with infliximab or cyclosporine, traditionally administered on day 3 of admission based on Modified Oxford Criteria. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of early (≤ 72 hours) versus standard (> 72 hours) infliximab administration on different clinical outcomes.
methodsA retrospective medical records review of patients admitted with ASUC who were administered infliximab rescue therapy due to inadequate steroid response was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: early infliximab therapy (≤ 72 hours of admission) and standard infliximab therapy (> 72 hours of admission). Outcomes assessed included length of stay, 12-month readmission and colectomy rates, and infective complications.
results84 patients (31 [37%] female, median age 34 [range 29-48.5] years) were included. 31 (37%) received early (median 52 [IQR 45–56] hours) and 53 (63%) had standard (median 105 [IQR 94–149] hours) infliximab therapy, with no significant demographic differences. Median length of stay was shorter in the early vs. standard group at 6 vs. 7 days (p = 0.048). No significant difference was seen in requirement for colectomy at index admission or at 12-months follow up (p > 0.99). Similarly, there was no significant difference in readmission rates at 6- (33.3% vs. 30%, p = 0.76) or 12-months (40% vs. 33.3% p = 0.64). There was no difference in rate of infective complications in the first 30 days.
conclusionEarly infliximab therapy was associated with shorter hospitalisation, with no difference in rates of colectomy, re-admission or infective complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.