ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
Multilingual analysis of public discourse on opioid and non-opioid analgesics through social media: a cross-sectional infodemiological study.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global opioid crisis has intensified concerns regarding misuse, overdose-related mortality, and the associated social and economic burden of both prescribed and illicit opioids. Social media platforms provide large volumes of real-time data that enable the capture of public perceptions, emerging risks, and shifts in discourse. This study analyzes a decade of conversations on X to characterize temporal trends, identify thematic patterns, and compare the evolution of public discourse in English and Spanish on opioids and other analgesics.
methodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted of all posts on X between 2014 and 2024 containing generic names of opioid analgesics, non-opioid analgesics, and opioid antagonists approved by national regulatory agencies. Following data collection, tweets were filtered by language and underwent normalization, cleaning, and lemmatization. Topic modeling was performed using Latent Dirichlet Allocation, applying online training with mini-batches to manage the size of the corpus.
resultsA total of 1,874,907 tweets were analyzed. Major opioids consistently generated the highest volume of discourse in both languages. Topic modeling revealed linguistic divergences: English-language tweets focused on personal experiences with opioids, the opioid crisis, and the pharmaceutical industry, whereas Spanish-language tweets emphasized therapeutic use, self-medication, alternatives for chronic pain, and emerging concerns regarding opioid potency.
conclusionsAnalysis of X represents a sensitive and dynamic tool for monitoring public discourse on opioids and other analgesics. The findings reveal relevant linguistic and cultural differences in narratives surrounding these medications, as well as temporal patterns aligned with epidemiological, media, and regulatory changes. Continuous social media monitoring enables early detection of shifts in risk perception and public attention, providing key insights for health communication, the identification of emerging risks, and the design of interventions tailored to specific sociocultural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.