Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42045831›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

Identification and analysis of salt-responsive F-box genes in upland cotton and the potential role of GhFBX83 in salt stress tolerance through regulating ROS homeostasis.

Xingyu Liu, Jianguang Liu, Zhao Geng, Guiyuan Zhao, Tianyu Feng, Yongping Zhou, Hanshuang Zhang, Pengfei Ai, Yongqiang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xingyu Liu *Institute of Cotton, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Shijiazhuang, P. R. China.
Jianguang Liu *Institute of Cotton, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Shijiazhuang, P. R. China.
Zhao GengInstitute of Cotton, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Shijiazhuang, P. R. China.
Guiyuan ZhaoInstitute of Cotton, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Shijiazhuang, P. R. China.
Tianyu FengInstitute of Cotton, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Shijiazhuang, P. R. China.
Yongping ZhouInstitute of Cotton, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Shijiazhuang, P. R. China.
Hanshuang ZhangInstitute of Cotton, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Shijiazhuang, P. R. China.
Pengfei AiCollege of Food Science and Biology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, P. R. China. apf2002@sina.com.
Yongqiang WangInstitute of Cotton, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Shijiazhuang, P. R. China. Wangyongqiang502@126.com.

Funding

Basic research fund of Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences 2024070203Hebei Natural Science Foundation C2023301050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe F-box family is among the largest gene families in plants and plays an extremely important role in diverse life processes, including salt responses. Most F-box proteins regulate stress responses through ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation as components of SCF (SKP1-CUL1-F-box) ubiquitin ligase complexes. However, knowledge of cotton F-box (GhFBX) genes and their roles in salt tolerance remains limited. In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the response of GhFBX genes to salt stress in cotton.

results160 salt-responsive GhFBX genes, which showed transcriptional expression differences in response to salt, were defined based on transcriptome data analysis, and their conserved domains, phylogenetic relationships, and chromosome locations were characterized. In accordance with the C-terminal conserved domains, the SR GhFBX genes were divided into 10 subfamilies. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that genes with the same C-terminal structural domains were mostly clustered together. The promoter regions of the SR GhFBX genes mainly contain three types of cis-elements, namely, hormone-responsive elements, light-responsive elements, and stress-related elements. To clarify how GhFBX and GhASK proteins interact, we selected 6 SR GhFBX genes and 4 SKP1 genes for interaction analysis using a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay. The results revealed that the SR GhFBX proteins can interact with various GhSKP1-like proteins. In addition, the SR gene GhFBX83 was selected for gene silencing via VIGS. The results revealed that silencing GhFBX83 increased proline (PRO) levels, significantly reduced hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and superoxide anion (O₂⁻) levels, and significantly increased the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) compared to the controls, thereby enhancing salt tolerance. These findings indicate that GhFBX83 acts as a negative regulator in the response to salt stress.

conclusionsThe research identified and analysed 160 salt-responsive (SR) GhFBX genes in Gossypium hirsutum (upland cotton) and GhFBX83 was found to negatively regulate salt tolerance by promoting the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This study provides valuable insights into the molecular basis of cotton salt tolerance and lays a foundation for further functional studies on cotton salt resistance breeding.

Indexed as

F-Box ProteinsGossypiumPlant ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSalt ToleranceGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantHomeostasisPhylogenySalt StressF-Box ProteinsPlant ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesCottonF-box geneInteractionROS accumulationSalt responses

Identifiers

PMID42045831
PMCPMC13255513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.